Introduction
Internet-based services enjoy broad legal protections over the third-party content they distribute, a safeguard offered by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Signed into law in 1996 when social media was in its infancy, Section 230 grants immunity to social media companies from virtually any form of civil litigation, including defamation, for third-party content on their platforms. The law also allows the companies to restrict content that violates their terms of service if they act in “good faith.” But as social media platforms' influence grows, critics across the political spectrum argue that Section 230 needs to be amended. Victims of online harassment say tech companies should be held accountable for violent or deceptive content they allow on their platforms. Some Republican lawmakers accuse social media companies of moderating user content with an anti-conservative bias. Yet free speech advocates argue that Section 230 is among the most valuable protections for free expression and innovation online. The result is a robust debate over whether Congress should weaken — or even eliminate — the protections offered by Section 230.
Social media companies such as Twitter and Facebook are facing intense scrutiny about their role in controlling deceptive and dangerous content on their sites. While the companies enjoy broad legal protections, experts debate whether those should be revised in an age of misinformation. (AFP/Getty Images/Nicolas Asfouri and Lionel Bonaventure)
|
|
|
Journalism, Newspapers, and the Media |
|
 |
Jan. 28, 2022 |
Misinformation and the Media |
 |
Oct. 02, 2020 |
Social Media Platforms |
 |
Sep. 18, 2020 |
The News Media |
 |
Aug. 24, 2018 |
Conspiracy Theories |
 |
Jun. 09, 2017 |
Trust in Media |
 |
May 30, 2014 |
Digital Journalism |
 |
May 03, 2013 |
Media Bias |
 |
Apr. 26, 2013 |
Free Speech at Risk |
 |
Apr. 12, 2013 |
Combat Journalism |
 |
Nov. 2010 |
Press Freedom |
 |
Oct. 08, 2010 |
Journalism Standards in the Internet Age |
 |
Feb. 05, 2010 |
Press Freedom |
 |
Mar. 27, 2009 |
Future of Journalism  |
 |
Jun. 09, 2006 |
Blog Explosion  |
 |
Jan. 20, 2006 |
Future of Newspapers |
 |
Apr. 08, 2005 |
Free-Press Disputes |
 |
Oct. 15, 2004 |
Media Bias |
 |
Oct. 10, 2003 |
Media Ownership  |
 |
Dec. 25, 1998 |
Journalism Under Fire |
 |
Jun. 05, 1998 |
Student Journalism |
 |
Sep. 20, 1996 |
Civic Journalism |
 |
Sep. 23, 1994 |
Courts and the Media |
 |
Aug. 24, 1990 |
Hard Times at the Nation's Newspapers |
 |
Jan. 19, 1990 |
Finding Truth in the Age of ‘Infotainment’ |
 |
Aug. 18, 1989 |
Libel Law: Finding the Right Balance |
 |
Jun. 06, 1986 |
Magazine Trends |
 |
Oct. 12, 1984 |
News Media and Presidential Campaigns |
 |
Jul. 15, 1983 |
State of American Newspapers |
 |
Oct. 23, 1981 |
High Cost of Libel |
 |
Dec. 23, 1977 |
Media Reforms |
 |
Mar. 11, 1977 |
News Media Ownership |
 |
Jun. 21, 1974 |
Access to the Media |
 |
Dec. 20, 1972 |
Newsmen's Rights |
 |
Aug. 16, 1972 |
Blacks in the News Media |
 |
Dec. 15, 1971 |
Magazine Industry Shake-Out |
 |
Jul. 18, 1969 |
Competing Media |
 |
Sep. 02, 1964 |
Politicians and the Press |
 |
Dec. 04, 1963 |
Libel Suits and Press Freedom |
 |
Jan. 09, 1963 |
Newspaper Mergers |
 |
Dec. 20, 1961 |
Reading Boom: Books and Magazines |
 |
Dec. 02, 1959 |
Privileged Communications |
 |
Apr. 25, 1956 |
Newsprint Deficit |
 |
May 06, 1953 |
Government and the Press |
 |
Sep. 21, 1948 |
Press and State |
 |
Sep. 05, 1947 |
Newsprint Supply |
 |
Mar. 26, 1947 |
Facsimile Newspapers |
 |
Dec. 10, 1945 |
World Press Freedom |
 |
May 01, 1940 |
New Experiments in Newspaper-Making |
 |
Nov. 04, 1933 |
Press Freedom Under the Recovery Program |
| | |
|