Bush's Defense Policy

September 7, 2001 • Volume 11, Issue 30
Is the president's plan too expensive?
By Mary H. Cooper

Introduction

The F-22 Raptor , the Pentagon's latest fighter, flies at twice the speed of sound. Its array of weapons are held inside the fuselage to make radar detection more difficult.  (AFP photos)
The F-22 Raptor , the Pentagon's latest fighter, flies at twice the speed of sound. Its array of weapons are held inside the fuselage to make radar detection more difficult. (AFP photos)

Defense against ballistic missiles from “rogue nations” is the controversial cornerstone of the president's emerging defense policy. The administration is not only developing a missile-defense system but also is inviting Russia to negotiate a “new strategic framework.” But critics say missile defense is too costly, technically unworkable and in violation of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which bars missile defenses and discourages nuclear proliferation. Still others complain that creating a missile defense system will open the door to putting weapons in outer space. Meanwhile, lawmakers from both parties say that the shrinking budget surplus may block funding of the $18 billion first phase of the president's missile defense system. Budget shortfalls may also undercut Bush's plans to modernize U.S. forces.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Defense Spending
Nov. 03, 2017  Military Readiness
Sep. 07, 2001  Bush's Defense Policy
Jul. 30, 1999  Defense Priorities
Sep. 29, 1989  Can Defense Contractors Survive Peace?
May 17, 1985  The Defense Economy
Apr. 16, 1982  Defense Spending Debate
Oct. 10, 1980  Defense Debate
Apr. 12, 1974  Peacetime Defense Spending
Sep. 24, 1969  Future of U.S. Defense Economy
Oct. 26, 1966  Defense Spending Management
Feb. 19, 1964  Arms Cutbacks and Economic Dislocation
Jun. 10, 1953  Defense Spending and Reorganization
Jan. 18, 1950  Civil Defense
Nov. 03, 1948  Atlantic Security and American Defense
BROWSE RELATED TOPICS:
General Defense and National Security