South Africa's ‘Total Strategy’

September 9, 1983

Report Outline
While Minority Control
Regional Domination
The American Role

While Minority Control

World Protest Fails to Break Apartheid

Almost as inevitable as the coming of fall, another session of the United Nations General Assembly means another round of condemnations of the white supremacist government of South Africa. Up for the U.N.'s consideration during the 38th annual session, beginning Sept. 20 in New York, is a report from its World Conference on Racism calling for new efforts to coerce South Africa to end its policy of apartheid, or racial separation. The conference specifically asks the Security Council to declare economic sanctions against South Africa. And it asks member nations to end all sporting, cultural and scientific contacts with that country.

The push for sanctions against South Africa hardly broke new ground. The world community, especially the Third World nations of Africa and elsewhere, have long denounced South Africa's apartheid government. Over the past 20 years, the United Nations has passed many resolutions against apartheid, created a Special Committee Against Apartheid, adopted the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid, passed in 1977 a mandatory arms embargo against South Africa, and declared 1982 to be the International Year for Mobilization of Sanctions Against South Africa. The U.N. also, in 1965, declared South Africa's occupation of South West Africa, also known as Namibia, to be illegal.

These actions and other forms of international criticism, along with the nation's geographic isolation on the tip of the black-dominated African continent, have created the image of South Africa as a “pariah state.” South Africa is hardly alone in the world though. Despite occasional and intermittently vigorous criticism from Western nations, including the United States, South Africa has normal diplomatic, economic and commercial trade relationships with most of the West. Vast mineral resources and the willingness of multinational manufacturers from the United States and Europe to locate there helped turn South Africa into a modern, industrial nation, so dominant regionally that it controls not only its own economic destiny but the destinies of the black African states around it.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Apr. 14, 2023  The New Scramble for Africa
Jul. 15, 2022  Africa in Transition
Oct. 22, 2021  ISIS in Africa
Feb. 23, 2018  Africa in Transition
Jul. 10, 2015  Terrorism in Africa
Nov. 20, 2012  Booming Africa
Apr. 05, 2011  Conflict in Congo
Aug. 2009  Attacking Piracy
Jun. 2009  The Troubled Horn of Africa
Sep. 2008  Crisis in Darfur
Jan. 2008  China in Africa
Sep. 09, 2005  Ending Poverty
Aug. 27, 2004  Stopping Genocide
Aug. 29, 2003  Aiding Africa
Nov. 08, 2002  Famine in Africa
Mar. 24, 1995  Democracy in Africa
Jan. 14, 1994  South Africa's Future
Mar. 23, 1990  U.S. Role in South Africa's Future
Nov. 07, 1986  Economic Turnabout In Africa
Jan. 17, 1986  Angola and the Reagan Doctrine
Sep. 09, 1983  South Africa's ‘Total Strategy’
Jul. 14, 1978  African Policy Reversal
Sep. 03, 1976  Africa and the Big Powers
Apr. 04, 1975  Southern Africa in Transition
Dec. 06, 1974  Ethiopia in Turmoil
May 09, 1973  African Nation Building
Feb. 28, 1968  Nigeria at War
Nov. 02, 1966  White Outposts in Southern Africa
Feb. 03, 1965  Congo Dilemma
Aug. 12, 1964  Red Rivalry in Africa
May 22, 1963  Political Turmoil in Southern Africa
Nov. 02, 1960  Tribalism and Nationalism in Africa
Sep. 28, 1960  Education for Africans
Apr. 10, 1959  Power Struggles in Colonial Africa
Aug. 20, 1958  Algerian Conflicts
Apr. 09, 1958  White Supremacy in South Africa
Sep. 11, 1957  Future of Algeria
Apr. 03, 1957  Political Awakening of Black Africa
Sep. 17, 1952  Africa and the West
Feb. 20, 1952  Nationalism in North Africa
Dec. 04, 1942  War Resources in Africa
May 29, 1935  Pre-War and Post-War Imperialism in Africa
Economic Development
Regional Political Affairs: Africa