Report Outline
Congress's Reopened JFK Case
Challenges to Past Findings
Added Causes of Public Doubt
Special Focus
Congress's Reopened JFK Case
Awaited Final Report From House Inquiry
Who killed John F. Kennedy?” is a question that will not go away. In the 15 years since the assassination, a wide variety of theories — some convincing, some bizarre — have been offered to explain how President Kennedy was murdered and why. Today, few Americans are without opinions on the subject. Amid a welter of conflicting speculation, a special Assassinations Committee was established nearly three years ago by the House of Representatives to re-examine the details of the case. But like so many past attempts to solve the mystery of what happened in Dallas, the committee may have raised more doubts than it put to rest.
At the conclusion of its hearings in December, the committee agreed with the basic findings of the Warren Commission — that Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots and the third shot killed the President — but it also announced the results of an acoustical study that seemed to show that four shots, not three, were fired at Kennedy. If the “noise analysis” is correct, a fourth shot would lend credence to the theory that there was another gunman besides Oswald, whom the Warren Commission named the sole assassin. Investigators have determined that Oswald's rifle could not have been fired and reloaded quickly enough for four shots to be fired from it in the 5.6 seconds that elapsed between the time the first and final shots were heard.
“Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy,” the committee said in a summary report issued Dec. 31. The report then concluded that the president was “probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.” There matters have remained while the committee has prepared to issue a final report, which may or may not throw further light on the new questions it has raised. The final report, originally due March 30, is expected to be made public in late April or early May. |
|
|
 |
Jan. 31, 2014 |
Whistleblowers |
 |
Feb. 18, 2011 |
Lies and Politics |
 |
Apr. 30, 2010 |
Gridlock in Washington |
 |
Jun. 22, 2007 |
Prosecutors and Politics |
 |
Jun. 16, 2006 |
Pork Barrel Politics |
 |
May 07, 1999 |
Independent Counsels Re-Examined |
 |
Feb. 21, 1997 |
Independent Counsels |
 |
May 27, 1994 |
Political Scandals |
 |
Apr. 06, 1979 |
Assassinations Investigation |
 |
Dec. 05, 1973 |
Presidential Impeachment |
 |
May 16, 1973 |
Ethics in Government |
 |
May 10, 1961 |
Secret Societies and Political Action |
 |
Jun. 29, 1960 |
Conflicts of Interest |
 |
Oct. 26, 1955 |
Businessmen in Government |
 |
Apr. 07, 1954 |
Fair Investigations |
 |
Apr. 25, 1952 |
Congressional Immunity |
 |
Dec. 05, 1951 |
Ethics in Government |
 |
Jan. 28, 1948 |
Individual Rights and Congressional Investigations |
 |
Jul. 02, 1934 |
Political Reform and Federal Patronage |
 |
Mar. 07, 1924 |
Congressional Extravagance and the Budget |
 |
Nov. 12, 1923 |
Issues Developed in the Teapot Dome Inquiry |
| | |
|