Report Outline
New and Old Approaches to Housing Bias
Racial Segregation in American Cities
Resistance to Open Housing Enforcement
New and Old Approaches to Housing Bias
Rioting in Detroit, Newark and more than two score other cities so far this summer has directed attention more sharply than ever to the continued existence and the demanding problems of urban Negro ghettos. Negroes in the cities are concentrated in segregated neighborhoods because, among other things, it has been almost impossible for them to find housing elsewhere. Racial discrimination helped to create the Negro ghetto and its attendant problems, and it has played a large part in preventing dispersal of the ghetto dwellers. Proponents of “open housing” laws believe they have found one way to relieve—though not eliminate—some of the feelings of hopelessness and being trapped that are at the root of Negro discontent.
Open Housing Laws and the Negro Ghettos
Twenty-one states and numerous cities have laid the basis for an attack on housing discrimination by enacting open housing legislation proscribing discrimination in the sale or rental of housing on the basis of race, color, creed or national origin. A major effort was made in 1966 to put through federal legislation of this kind, but it failed in the U. S. Senate. This year the emphasis has been at state and local levels. However, the Defense Department has launched a nationwide drive to do away with discrimination against Negro servicemen seeking housing in the vicinity of military bases.
There has been active agitation for additional open housing legislation in such disparate places as Nebraska, where in June the state's unicameral legislature rejected such a bill by a vote of 28 to 21, and the Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C., where open housing ordinances are being adopted. Some question has been raised as to whether legal prohibitions on housing discrimination serve much practical purpose. It has even been argued that the push for open housing laws, by shifting attention away from provision of a more plentiful supply of low-income housing has hurt rather than helped ghetto residents. |
|
Segregation and Desegregation |
|
 |
Apr. 23, 2004 |
School Desegregation |
 |
Oct. 18, 1996 |
Rethinking School Integration |
 |
Feb. 24, 1995 |
Housing Discrimination |
 |
Dec. 26, 1975 |
Busing Reappraisal |
 |
May 03, 1974 |
Desegregation After 20 Years |
 |
Aug. 24, 1973 |
Educational Equality |
 |
Sep. 06, 1972 |
Blacks on Campus |
 |
Mar. 01, 1972 |
School Busing and Politics |
 |
Aug. 16, 1967 |
Open Housing |
 |
Apr. 29, 1964 |
School Desegregation: 1954–1964 |
 |
Feb. 06, 1963 |
Interracial Housing |
 |
Aug. 27, 1958 |
School Integration: Fifth Year |
 |
Jan. 15, 1958 |
Residential Desegregation |
 |
Oct. 16, 1957 |
Legal Processes in Race Relations |
 |
Oct. 17, 1956 |
Enforcement of School Integration |
 |
Jan. 12, 1955 |
School Desegregation |
 |
Sep. 03, 1954 |
Segregation in Churches |
 |
Oct. 08, 1952 |
Race Segregation |
 |
Nov. 07, 1947 |
Negro Segregation |
| | |
|