Report Outline
Pressure to Reduce U.S. Forces in Europe
Current Status of Nato and U. S. Forces
United States and the Defense of Europe
Special Focus
Pressure to Reduce U.S. Forces in Europe
Maintenance of a large number of American troops in Europe has been virtually an article of faith for United States policy makers since emergence of the Soviet threat after World War II. But in recent months this tenet has come under increased attack from congressional and other skeptics. They cast doubt on the wisdom of relying on a 20-year-old policy in the face of drastically changed conditions.
The new look at the rationale behind heavy commitment of American forces in Europe results from a combination of developments. The review was triggered by France's decision, announced in March 1966, to withdraw from the integrated military command of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. President de Gaulle's verdict presented alliance military planners with two problems: 1) whether to replace the French forces withdrawn from the command on July 1 or accept a reduced combat readiness level; and 2) the complicated task of shifting all Nato and American personnel, facilities, and material out of France by next April 1.
At the root of the current discussion of American force levels in Europe is the belief—held widely in Europe and the United States—that there is little likelihood at present of a Soviet attack in the West. A reduction in troop levels therefore would be more acceptable than in the past. It would be doubly acceptable to the United States in view of the growing strain on this country's manpower and fiscal resources. Expansion of the American war effort in Southeast Asia has necessitated increases in an already vast military establishment at a time when 210,000 combat-ready forces are tied down in West Germany. Maintenance of a large number of American troops abroad, moreover, imposes a heavy drain on the U. S. Treasury and contributes markedly to the chronic deficit in this country's balance of international payments. |
|
|
 |
Oct. 04, 2019 |
Veterans' Struggles |
 |
Sep. 23, 2011 |
Military Suicides |
 |
Sep. 05, 2008 |
Rise in Counterinsurgency |
 |
Aug. 31, 2007 |
Wounded Veterans |
 |
Nov. 19, 2004 |
Treatment of Veterans |
 |
Jun. 25, 2004 |
Privatizing the Military |
 |
May 30, 2003 |
Reforming the Corps |
 |
Apr. 26, 1996 |
New Military Culture |
 |
Jun. 08, 1990 |
Downsizing America's Armed Forces |
 |
Jul. 20, 1966 |
American Forces in Europe |
 |
Jan. 15, 1964 |
American Troops Abroad |
 |
May 21, 1958 |
Military Reorganization |
 |
Feb. 28, 1952 |
Benefits for Korean Veterans |
 |
May 12, 1948 |
Militarization |
 |
Nov. 06, 1946 |
Veterans' Bonus |
 |
Jul. 17, 1946 |
War Veterans in Civil Life |
 |
Nov. 27, 1941 |
Government Aid to Ex-Service Men |
 |
Sep. 27, 1932 |
The Bonus After the 1932 Elections |
 |
Oct. 06, 1930 |
Veteran-Aid Policies of the United States |
 |
Jan. 07, 1924 |
Congress and the Bonus |
| | |
|