Prolongation of Life

July 13, 1966

Report Outline
Moral Issues in Prolongation of Life
Slow Progress on Road to Longer Life
Replacement of Disabled Vital Organs

Moral Issues in Prolongation of Life

Hard Decisions Involved in Extension of Life

Modern medicine's increasing ability to stave off temporarily the inevitable outcome of degenerative disease is raising moral problems that require difficult decisions by doctors and by patients and their families. Among the most poignant of the questions that often have to be answered is whether a patient on the brink of death should be allowed to die then and there, or whether measures should be taken to keep him alive a little longer even when there is no hope of recovery. Ultimately, society itself may be forced to make equally difficult decisions regarding prolongation of life in general, and for periods that may be counted in years rather than merely days or hours.

The latter decisions will involve all kinds of hard questions. What if replacement of vital organs prolongs the life of an individual but at the same time debases the quality of that life? What if a life-saving procedure is so demanding of specialist manpower and so costly that it is available only to the well-to-do? Then there is the question of how many months or years of life are worth the cost of certain treatments in terms not only of money but also of human suffering, of the use of medical manpower, and of the effects on society. Doctors always have had to balance hoped-for benefits against possible harm from particular medical or surgical procedures. Drastic new forms of surgery and the proliferation of new drugs with known and unknown side-effects now have vastly multiplied and complicated the doctors' dilemmas.

Possibility of Dread Consequeces for Mankind

The most fundamental of all moral problems raised by medical science pertain to its present and potentially greater future capacity to prolong life. To live as long as possible has always been man's fondest dream. Until recently, few questioned the doctor's duty to do his utmost to keep death at bay, however sick, injured, or aged the patient. Yet today even those whose work holds promise of adding years to the lifespan question the value of stretching individual life to the last possible breath.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Nutrition and Health
Jul. 07, 2017  Hunger in America
Oct. 30, 2015  Dietary Supplements
Aug. 08, 2014  Global Hunger
Oct. 01, 2010  Preventing Obesity
Apr. 07, 2006  Rising Health Costs
Feb. 10, 2006  Eating Disorders Updated
Sep. 03, 2004  Dietary Supplements
Jan. 31, 2003  Obesity Epidemic
Feb. 23, 2001  Diet and Health
Jan. 15, 1999  Obesity and Health
Sep. 26, 1997  Youth Fitness
Apr. 14, 1995  Dieting and Health
Jul. 08, 1994  Dietary Supplements
Dec. 18, 1992  Eating Disorders
Nov. 06, 1992  Physical Fitness
Jul. 31, 1992  Infant Mortality
Oct. 25, 1991  World Hunger
Mar. 16, 1990  Public-Health Campaigns: Do They Go Too Far?
Apr. 29, 1988  How America Eats
Sep. 06, 1985  Anorexia and Other Eating Disorders
May 18, 1984  Dining in America
Aug. 26, 1983  Staying Healthy
Nov. 19, 1982  Weight Control: A National Obsession
Oct. 17, 1980  Caffeine Controversy
Apr. 14, 1978  Physical Fitness Boom
Jun. 17, 1977  Obesity and Health
Feb. 22, 1974  Heart Research
Aug. 01, 1973  Nutrition in America
Dec. 02, 1970  Infant Health
Nov. 15, 1967  Overweight and Health
Aug. 10, 1966  Dental Health
Jul. 13, 1966  Prolongation of Life
May 09, 1962  Outdoor Recreation
Nov. 26, 1958  Dieting and Health
Jul. 13, 1949  Recreation for Millions
May 13, 1941  Nutrition and National Health
Biology and Life Sciences
Elderly Health Issues
Medical Profession and Personnel
Right to Die