Report Outline
Secrecy Aspects of John Birch Society
Secret Societies on the American Scene
Means of Controlling Secret Societies
Secrecy Aspects of John Birch Society
Many Americans were shocked recently to learn of the existence of a secret or semi-secret organization of extensive proportions known as the John Birch Society—an extreme anti-Communist group dedicated to promoting radical changes in public policy. The society is little more than two years old. To date its political activity on a national scale seems to have been limited for the most part to a letter-writing campaign to generate pressure for impeachment of Chief Justice Earl Warren. Under ordinary circumstances, an organization holding views as fanatical as those attributed to the John Birch Society or its leader would attract no more than casual attention. Yet stories about this group have taken up columns of newspaper space all over the country, and it has been both attacked and defended repeatedly in both houses of Congress.
Particular objection has been raised to the John Birch Society's sub rosa methods of operating, which seem not unlike those favored by Communist and Fascist conspirators bent on undermining democratic governments. The extremity of the society's views is illustrated by the fact that it calls not only for Warren's impeachment, but also for repeal of the federal income tax and of the social security laws, for withdrawal of the United States from the United Nations and from the North Atlantic Alliance, and for termination of foreign aid and of cultural exchanges with the U.S.S.R.
Few Americans would challenge the right of private individuals to advance unorthodox opinions, and few would fear open debate on the merits of the Birch program. But until the society began to receive publicity early this year, the general public was scarcely aware of its existence, much less of its objectives or tactics. Many persons sensed something sinister in an association of well-to-do, influential Americans seeking by surreptitious means to shake public confidence in government leaders and to weaken support of public policy in major areas affecting national security. |
|
|
 |
Jan. 31, 2014 |
Whistleblowers |
 |
Feb. 18, 2011 |
Lies and Politics |
 |
Apr. 30, 2010 |
Gridlock in Washington |
 |
Jun. 22, 2007 |
Prosecutors and Politics |
 |
Jun. 16, 2006 |
Pork Barrel Politics |
 |
May 07, 1999 |
Independent Counsels Re-Examined |
 |
Feb. 21, 1997 |
Independent Counsels |
 |
May 27, 1994 |
Political Scandals |
 |
Apr. 06, 1979 |
Assassinations Investigation |
 |
Dec. 05, 1973 |
Presidential Impeachment |
 |
May 16, 1973 |
Ethics in Government |
 |
May 10, 1961 |
Secret Societies and Political Action |
 |
Jun. 29, 1960 |
Conflicts of Interest |
 |
Oct. 26, 1955 |
Businessmen in Government |
 |
Apr. 07, 1954 |
Fair Investigations |
 |
Apr. 25, 1952 |
Congressional Immunity |
 |
Dec. 05, 1951 |
Ethics in Government |
 |
Jan. 28, 1948 |
Individual Rights and Congressional Investigations |
 |
Jul. 02, 1934 |
Political Reform and Federal Patronage |
 |
Mar. 07, 1924 |
Congressional Extravagance and the Budget |
 |
Nov. 12, 1923 |
Issues Developed in the Teapot Dome Inquiry |
| | |
|