Red China and the United Nations

September 15, 1954

Report Outline
Conflict Over China's Seat in United Nations
Record of United Nations Action on Red China
Political and Legal Issues in the China Case
Special Focus

Conflict Over China's Seat in United Nations

Rise of New Factors Since Last General Assembly

Representation of Red China in the United Nations—an issue that hag been contested for nearly five years in every principal forum of the world organization—will be in the forefront of political discussion again when the General Assembly convenes on Sept. 21 for its ninth regular session. New factors have entered the picture since the Assembly dealt with the matter a year ago. The Indo-China truce, agreed to at Geneva on July 21, has revived pressure in some countries to reopen the question of Chinese representation, and several U.N. member states which formerly voted to put off consideration of the issue are said to favor taking it up now. At the same time, other developments have stiffened opposition in the United States to seating Red China.

The question of Chinese representation in the United Nations is complicated by differences, not only between the free world and the Communist world, but also between some of the nations of the free world. Burma, Ceylon, India, and Indonesia, for example, held aloof from the recent Manila conference on Southeast Asian security. India, in particular, frowned upon American efforts to organize collective defense measures against Communist aggression in Asia; instead, it urged a policy of conciliation to ease tensions. And at Geneva the United States did not see eye to eye with Britain and France on terms of the Indo-China truce; it declined to join in the final declaration of the conference or to participate in the arrangements for enforcing the armistice. Such differences of approach to the Communist problem in the Far East have their counterparts in the attitudes of the respective countries on Chinese representation in the world organization.

Opposition of United States to Seating Red Chinac

The long-standing opposition of the United States to seating the Chinese Communists in the United Nations was reaffirmed by President Eisenhower during the final stages of the Geneva parley. At a news conference, July 7, the President said he was “completely and unalterably opposed under the present situation to the admission of Red China into the United Nations,” and he thought that “95 percent of the population of the United States would take the same stand.” Secretary of State Dulles the following day again made plain the intention of the American government to use all its influence to prevent the admission of Red China, under existing conditions, to any of the major organs of the United Nations. Dulles declared that the United States would use the veto if necessary to keep the Peiping regime out of the Security Council, the only U.N. organ in which a veto is applicable.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Apr. 08, 2022  China Today
Jul. 24, 2020  China Rising
Jan. 25, 2019  China's Belt and Road Initiative
Jan. 20, 2017  China and the South China Sea
Apr. 04, 2014  China Today
May 07, 2010  U.S.-China Relations Updated
Nov. 11, 2005  Emerging China
Aug. 04, 2000  China Today
Jun. 13, 1997  China After Deng
May 24, 1996  Taiwan, China and the U.S.
Apr. 15, 1994  U.S. - China Trade
Apr. 13, 1984  China: Quest for Stability and Development
Dec. 05, 1980  Trade with China
Sep. 08, 1978  China's Opening Door
Feb. 08, 1974  China After Mao
May 26, 1972  Future of Taiwan
Jun. 16, 1971  Reconciliation with China
Aug. 07, 1968  China Under Mao
Sep. 13, 1967  Burma and Red China
Mar. 15, 1967  Hong Kong and Macao: Windows into China
Apr. 27, 1966  China and the West
Nov. 25, 1964  Relations With Red China
Oct. 05, 1960  Russia and Red China
Mar. 18, 1959  Red China's Communes
Oct. 22, 1958  Overseas Chinese
Jul. 24, 1957  China Policy
Apr. 24, 1957  Passport Policy
Feb. 16, 1955  Problem of Formosa
Sep. 15, 1954  Red China and the United Nations
Apr. 28, 1953  Status of Red China
Apr. 03, 1953  War in Indo-China
Mar. 13, 1952  Chinese-Soviet Relations
Jun. 20, 1951  Blockades and Embargoes
Aug. 29, 1950  Formosa Policy
Mar. 09, 1950  Aid to Indo-China
Nov. 24, 1948  China's Civil War
Aug. 06, 1945  Government of China
Feb. 17, 1945  Development of China
Jun. 07, 1943  Oriental Exclusion
Oct. 26, 1936  Chino-Japanese Relations
Jan. 02, 1928  The Position and Problems of Chinese Nationalism
Apr. 15, 1927  Foreign Intervention in China
Feb. 04, 1927  China and the Great Powers
Dec. 18, 1925  Extraterritoriality in China
Sep. 24, 1924  Military and Civil Aspects of the War in China
Diplomacy and Diplomats
Regional Political Affairs: East Asia and the Pacific
United Nations