Report Outline
Problems after a cease-fire in korea
Communist China and the United Nations
Shifts in United States China Policy
Present Positions of Rival Chinese Regimes
Problems after a cease-fire in korea
What to do about Red China is rapidly emerging as the most difficult problem for the United States in the Far East. Directly connected with it are the formidable political issues of the future of Formosa and Chinese Communist representation in the United Nations. Moscow and Peking are certain to press these questions in the peace negotiations that will follow successful conclusion of a Korean armistice.
Armistice talks between the U.N. Command, headed by the United States, and military representatives of North Korea and Red China have been limited to purely military questions. When they were broken off last October after 15 months of negotiation, agreement had been reached on all agenda items except repatriation of war prisoners. If the prisoner problem is solved in the talks resumed at Panmunjom on Apr. 26, the draft armistice agreement should be in shape for early signing. After conclusion of an armistice, the next step would be to arrange a political conference for a peace settlement.
Provision for Early Peace Conference
Article 60 of the Korean draft armistice agreement, as formulated by the military negotiators, recommends that the governments concerned hold a political conference three months after the armistice goes into effect. The article specifically provides that the conference should negotiate on withdrawal of all foreign forces from Korea, peaceful settlement of the Korean (political) question, “et cetera.” The “et cetera” was added in February 1952 after the U.N. Command had rejected a Red request that the Formosa question and Chinese Communist representation in the U.N. be named as subjects for discussion at the peace conference. The full scope of the conference clearly has been left for future diplomatic decision; either side could propose that the agenda be broadened to cover other Far Eastern problems. |
|
|
 |
Apr. 08, 2022 |
China Today |
 |
Jul. 24, 2020 |
China Rising |
 |
Jan. 25, 2019 |
China's Belt and Road Initiative |
 |
Jan. 20, 2017 |
China and the South China Sea |
 |
Apr. 04, 2014 |
China Today |
 |
May 07, 2010 |
U.S.-China Relations  |
 |
Nov. 11, 2005 |
Emerging China |
 |
Aug. 04, 2000 |
China Today |
 |
Jun. 13, 1997 |
China After Deng |
 |
May 24, 1996 |
Taiwan, China and the U.S. |
 |
Apr. 15, 1994 |
U.S. - China Trade |
 |
Apr. 13, 1984 |
China: Quest for Stability and Development |
 |
Dec. 05, 1980 |
Trade with China |
 |
Sep. 08, 1978 |
China's Opening Door |
 |
Feb. 08, 1974 |
China After Mao |
 |
May 26, 1972 |
Future of Taiwan |
 |
Jun. 16, 1971 |
Reconciliation with China |
 |
Aug. 07, 1968 |
China Under Mao |
 |
Sep. 13, 1967 |
Burma and Red China |
 |
Mar. 15, 1967 |
Hong Kong and Macao: Windows into China |
 |
Apr. 27, 1966 |
China and the West |
 |
Nov. 25, 1964 |
Relations With Red China |
 |
Oct. 05, 1960 |
Russia and Red China |
 |
Mar. 18, 1959 |
Red China's Communes |
 |
Oct. 22, 1958 |
Overseas Chinese |
 |
Jul. 24, 1957 |
China Policy |
 |
Apr. 24, 1957 |
Passport Policy |
 |
Feb. 16, 1955 |
Problem of Formosa |
 |
Sep. 15, 1954 |
Red China and the United Nations |
 |
Apr. 28, 1953 |
Status of Red China |
 |
Apr. 03, 1953 |
War in Indo-China |
 |
Mar. 13, 1952 |
Chinese-Soviet Relations |
 |
Jun. 20, 1951 |
Blockades and Embargoes |
 |
Aug. 29, 1950 |
Formosa Policy |
 |
Mar. 09, 1950 |
Aid to Indo-China |
 |
Nov. 24, 1948 |
China's Civil War |
 |
Aug. 06, 1945 |
Government of China |
 |
Feb. 17, 1945 |
Development of China |
 |
Jun. 07, 1943 |
Oriental Exclusion |
 |
Oct. 26, 1936 |
Chino-Japanese Relations |
 |
Jan. 02, 1928 |
The Position and Problems of Chinese Nationalism |
 |
Apr. 15, 1927 |
Foreign Intervention in China |
 |
Feb. 04, 1927 |
China and the Great Powers |
 |
Dec. 18, 1925 |
Extraterritoriality in China |
 |
Sep. 24, 1924 |
Military and Civil Aspects of the War in China |
| | |
|