Report Outline
North-South Schism in Democratic Party
Moves to Promote a Party Realignment
Southern Demands on Democratic Party
North-South Schism in Democratic Party
Truman, Eisenhower, and Invasion of Solid South
If Truman and Eisenhower become rival contenders for the presidency next year, there is a strong chance that the Republican party will repeat its feat of 24 years earlier and split the Democratic Solid South. Republican capture of the electoral votes of four southern states in 1928 resulted not so much from the drawing power of Herbert Hoover as from the South's adverse reaction to the candidacy of Alfred E. Smith. With a Truman-Eisenhower lineup in 1952, positive as well as negative forces would be operating to produce a split—on the one hand the popular appeal of Gen. Eisenhower; on the other hand southern opposition to the President's Fair Deal program in general and to his civil rights proposals in particular.
Although the same combination of factors will not be present if other men head the major party tickets, any Republican nominee may profit from the adverse factors if Truman runs again. The South's attitude toward the White House has been conspicuously demonstrated by the frequency with which southern members of Congress have voted with the Republicans in opposition to the administration. The southern Democratic-Republican coalition has been more powerful in the 82nd Congress than at any time since it began to take shape about 15 years ago; in fact, it is now the effective majority in the national legislature.
As a result, there have been suggestions from Republican sources that the coalition be formalized through a political realignment calculated by its proponents to bring about a Republican victory in 1952. Southern Democrats themselves have shown little enthusiasm for that proposal, but some of their leading spokesmen have left no doubt of their determination to fight in next year's convention to win recognition of southern views and curb the influence of the forces that have been dominant in the Democratic party for the last 20 years. |
|
|
 |
May 26, 2023 |
Congressional Investigations |
 |
Jan. 06, 2023 |
Dark Money |
 |
Mar. 25, 2022 |
The Democrats' Future |
 |
Apr. 30, 2021 |
The GOP's Future |
 |
Oct. 13, 2017 |
Future of the Democratic Party |
 |
Sep. 09, 2016 |
Populism and Party Politics |
 |
Nov. 14, 2014 |
Nonprofit Groups and Partisan Politics |
 |
Oct. 24, 2014 |
Future of the GOP |
 |
Feb. 28, 2014 |
Polarization in America |
 |
Mar. 19, 2010 |
Tea Party Movement  |
 |
Mar. 20, 2009 |
Future of the GOP |
 |
Jun. 08, 2007 |
Democrats in Congress |
 |
Apr. 30, 2004 |
The Partisan Divide |
 |
Dec. 22, 1995 |
Third-Party Prospects |
 |
Jan. 11, 1985 |
Post-1984 Political Landscape |
 |
Nov. 09, 1984 |
Democratic Revival in South America |
 |
Sep. 14, 1984 |
Election 1984 |
 |
Dec. 19, 1980 |
Future of the Democratic Party |
 |
Sep. 29, 1978 |
New Right in American Politics |
 |
Jan. 04, 1974 |
Future of Conservatism |
 |
May 03, 1972 |
The New Populism |
 |
Feb. 02, 1956 |
Foreign Policy in Political Campaigns |
 |
Dec. 22, 1954 |
Divided Government |
 |
Aug. 04, 1952 |
Two-Party System |
 |
Jun. 06, 1952 |
Party Platforms |
 |
Sep. 05, 1951 |
Southern Democrats and the 1952 Election |
 |
Oct. 06, 1948 |
Voting in 1948 |
 |
Aug. 27, 1948 |
Republicans and Foreign Policy |
 |
Jul. 16, 1947 |
Third Party Movements |
 |
Aug. 22, 1940 |
Political Realignments |
 |
Jan. 13, 1938 |
The G. O. P. and the Solid South |
 |
Jul. 22, 1936 |
Third Party Movements in American Politics |
 |
Jul. 07, 1936 |
The Monopoly Issue in Party Politics |
 |
Nov. 12, 1935 |
Party Platforms and the 1936 Campaign |
 |
May 18, 1934 |
Political Trends and New Party Movements |
 |
Jan. 13, 1932 |
National Party Platforms, 1832–1932 |
 |
May 16, 1928 |
Third Party Movements |
 |
Jan. 21, 1928 |
Major Party Platforms 1924–1928 |
 |
Nov. 14, 1924 |
The Election and the Third Party |
 |
Sep. 05, 1924 |
Party Claims and Past Political Complexion of the States |
 |
Jun. 25, 1924 |
Third Party Platforms |
 |
Jun. 18, 1924 |
Thrid Parties: Past and Prospective |
| | |
|