Report Outline
The United States and Enforcement of Peace in China
The Boycott as a Weapon of Militarily Weak Nations
The Boycott as an Agency to Enforce Peace
Anti-Japanese Boycott and Embargo Proposals, 1932
The United States and Enforcement of Peace in China
The Military Activity of Japan in Manchuria and at Shanghai and the efforts of the powers to bring hostilities to a halt have focused attention on the world's peace machinery and the means available to enforce existing treaties and covenants. While it never seemed likely that the League of Nations would attempt to apply against Japan the economic sanctions contemplated by Article 16 of the Covenant, there has been advocacy in the United States of a boycott against Japanese goods and of an embargo against the export of arms and ammunition to the Orient. Such proposals have not elicited the support of the administration. Secretary of State Stimson has latterly assumed a leading role in the whole question, however, by enunciating the doctrine that the United States would refuse to recognize any situation or treaty resulting from violation of the Nine-Power Treaty or the Kellogg Pact. This doctrine was incorporated in a resolution approved by the League Assembly, March 11, 1932,
A recommendation that the United States convoke a conference of the signatories of the Kellogg Pact, for the purpose of framing an amendment providing for application of joint measures of non-intercourse against a violator of the pact, was made March 13, 1932, by the Committee on Economic Sanctions, of which President Nicholas Murray Butler of Columbia is chairman. Under the proposed amendment the signatories would be obliged, when hostilities threatened, to call a conference which should decide upon specific measures of non-intercourse designed to keep the peace in the situation under consideration.
The policy of non-intercourse was used by the United States against France and England more than a century ago. In recent times employment of the boycott has been chiefly confined to China and India, where it has been brought to a high degree of effectiveness. Except for pacific blockades, application of economic sanctions on an international basis as a means of enforcing peace has never been attempted. |
|
|
 |
Jul. 26, 2002 |
Japan in Crisis |
 |
May 31, 1991 |
The U.S. And Japan |
 |
Apr. 09, 1982 |
Tensions in U.S.-Japanese Relations |
 |
Jul. 01, 1977 |
Japanese Elections |
 |
Mar. 04, 1970 |
Emergent Japan |
 |
Jun. 25, 1969 |
Okinawa Question |
 |
Jan. 05, 1966 |
Rising Japanese Nationalism |
 |
Jun. 02, 1960 |
Japan: Disturbed Ally |
 |
Nov. 18, 1959 |
Japanese Competition in International Trade |
 |
May 11, 1955 |
Relations With Japan |
 |
Nov. 03, 1954 |
Japan's Economy |
 |
Jan. 09, 1952 |
Trade with Japan |
 |
Feb. 28, 1951 |
Japan and Pacific Security |
 |
Sep. 19, 1947 |
Peace with Japan |
 |
Aug. 14, 1945 |
Emperor of Japan |
 |
Nov. 03, 1944 |
Russo-Japanese Relations |
 |
Dec. 09, 1939 |
The United States and Japan's New Order in Asia |
 |
Dec. 05, 1938 |
Japan and the Open Door Policy |
 |
Apr. 29, 1935 |
Japanese Foreign Trade Expansion |
 |
May 11, 1934 |
Japanese Policy in Asia |
 |
Oct. 12, 1932 |
Japanese-American Relations |
 |
Mar. 17, 1932 |
Boycotts and Embargoes |
 |
Feb. 10, 1932 |
Militarism Vs. Liberalism in Japan |
| | |
|