Report Outline
Resumption of Nuclear Weapons Race
Deadlock on Inspection and Control
Controversy Over Dangers of Fallout
Resumption of Nuclear Weapons Race
Peremptory rejection by the Soviet Union, on the second day of the 17-nation disarmament conference which met at Geneva on March 14, of an Anglo-American draft treaty to ban nuclear weapons tests was a severe blow to hopes for East-West agreement on a first essential step toward general and complete disarmament. These hopes were revived in some measure by the statement of the British Foreign Secretary, Lord Home, March 20, that Great Britain, in addition to concessions already made in the Western draft treaty, would be willing to accept an “absolute minimum” of international inspection if Russia would agree to a reasonable compromise and permit negotiation of a definitive treaty to prohibit further tests of nuclear weapons.
Lacking such accomplishment at Geneva, President Kennedy has given notice that the United States will resume nuclear testing in the air by the end of April. The Soviet Union, which conducted its latest series of tests last autumn, has stated that it will test again if the United States does so. And it may not be long before Communist China enters the nuclear race. Sen. Hubert H. Humphrey (D Minn.), chairman of a Senate disarmament subcommittee, said last Jan. 22 that Peiping might explode an atomic device “anytime within this year.”
East-West Differences at Geneva on Testing
The draft treaty proposed by the United States and Great Britain on March 15 was a modified version, of a document presented by them at the three-power Geneva testban conference last April. The 1961 draft called for cessation of nuclear weapons tests above and below ground and under water; a voluntary moratorium on underground explosions of less than 19 kilotons; an annual quota of 20 onsite inspections of suspected clandestine tests on territories of each of the three nuclear powers; direction of an international control commission by a single administrator acceptable to the three countries. |
|
Weapons of Mass Destruction |
|
 |
Jul. 29, 2016 |
Modernizing the Nuclear Arsenal |
 |
Mar. 08, 2002 |
Weapons of Mass Destruction |
 |
Jan. 31, 1997 |
Chemical and Biological Weapons |
 |
Jun. 24, 1994 |
Nuclear Arms Cleanup |
 |
Jun. 05, 1992 |
Nuclear Proliferation |
 |
Jun. 29, 1990 |
Obstacles to Bio-Chemical Disarmament |
 |
Apr. 22, 1988 |
The Military Build-Down in the 1990s |
 |
May 24, 1987 |
Euromissile Negotiations |
 |
Jul. 11, 1986 |
Chemical Weapons |
 |
Apr. 27, 1984 |
Reagan's Defense Buildup |
 |
Jun. 04, 1982 |
Civil Defense |
 |
Jul. 17, 1981 |
Controlling Nuclear Proliferation |
 |
Jun. 05, 1981 |
MX Missile Decision |
 |
Aug. 15, 1980 |
The Neutron Bomb and European Defense |
 |
Sep. 07, 1979 |
Atomic Secrecy |
 |
Mar. 17, 1978 |
Nuclear Proliferation |
 |
May 27, 1977 |
Chemical-Biological Warfare |
 |
May 13, 1977 |
Politics of Strategic Arms Negotiations |
 |
Nov. 15, 1974 |
Nuclear Safeguards |
 |
Jul. 01, 1970 |
Nuclear Balance of Terror: 25 Years After Alamogordo |
 |
Jun. 18, 1969 |
Chemical–Biological Weaponry |
 |
Jun. 30, 1965 |
Atomic Proliferation |
 |
Mar. 21, 1962 |
Nuclear Testing Dilemmas |
 |
Aug. 16, 1961 |
Shelters and Survival |
 |
Oct. 12, 1959 |
Chemical-Biological Warfare |
 |
May 13, 1959 |
Nuclear Test Ban |
 |
Dec. 04, 1957 |
Scientific Cooperation and Atlantic Security |
 |
May 15, 1957 |
Changing Defense Concepts |
 |
Jul. 03, 1956 |
Civil Defense, 1956 |
 |
Nov. 16, 1955 |
International Arms Deals |
 |
Oct. 04, 1954 |
Industrial Defense |
 |
Apr. 15, 1954 |
National Defense Strategy |
 |
Feb. 10, 1954 |
New Aproaches to Atomic Control |
 |
Oct. 10, 1953 |
Atomic Information |
 |
Apr. 11, 1952 |
Biological Warfare |
 |
Oct. 03, 1951 |
World Arms Race |
 |
Feb. 04, 1948 |
International Control of Atomic Energy |
 |
Dec. 06, 1946 |
International Inspection |
 |
Aug. 27, 1943 |
Gas Warfare |
 |
Jul. 24, 1937 |
The New Race in Armaments |
 |
May 05, 1932 |
Abolition of Aggressive Weapons |
| | |
|