Report Outline
Naional Labour Crisis and Chrysler Strike
Origin End Technique of the Sit-Down Strike
Advantages for Labor in Sit-Down Strategy
Legal Aspects and Legislative Remedies
Naional Labour Crisis and Chrysler Strike
Evaluation of the Chrysler plants at Detroit on March 25 by the 6,000 sit-downers who had held them in defiance of a court eviction order eased an extremely tense strike situation on the eve of a White House conference between President Roosevelt and congressional leaders, called in response to insistent demands for clarification of the administration's position with respect to labor's widespread use of a new and potentially dangerous form of the strike weapon. Restoration of the property to the company was obtained only upon the agreement of Walter P. Chrysler, chairman of the Chrysler Corporation, in conference with John L, Lewis, chairman of the Committee for Industrial Organization, that no attempt would be made to operate the plants and that no machinery would be moved out of them for operation elsewhere pending conclusion of negotiations for settlement of the current dispute.
The Chrysler strike continues, but it continues, not as a sit-down, but as a traditional walkout strike, with the workers' position reinforced by the company's pledge not to attempt introduction of strikebreakers or take other action that the strikers could have prevented so long as they held the plants. While the strikers thus retain the tactical advantages gained by use of the sit-down, respect for law and order is restored.
During recent days, as the wave of sit-down strikes mounted in Detroit and other cities, Governor Murphy of Michigan in successive public statements laid increasing emphasis upon the necessity of obedience to duly constituted authority if democratic processes were to survive. Just before announcement of the agreement for evacuation of the Chrysler plants, it became known that the Governor, long reluctant to take the risks of forcible eviction, was ready to move troops into Detroit if the conference between Chrysler and Lewis was unsuccessful. |
|
|
 |
Aug. 07, 2015 |
Unions at a Crossroads |
 |
Sep. 02, 2005 |
Labor Unions' Future  |
 |
Jun. 28, 1996 |
Labor Movement's Future |
 |
Jun. 14, 1985 |
Organized Labor in the 1980s |
 |
Nov. 06, 1981 |
Labor Under Siege |
 |
Mar. 24, 1978 |
Labor's Southern Strategy |
 |
Aug. 20, 1976 |
Labor's Options |
 |
Oct. 27, 1971 |
Organized Labor After the Freeze |
 |
Oct. 19, 1966 |
Labor Strife and the Public Interest |
 |
Jan. 30, 1963 |
Strike Action and the Law |
 |
Sep. 20, 1961 |
Conflicts in Organized Labor |
 |
Aug. 04, 1960 |
Labor, Management, and the National Interest |
 |
Dec. 16, 1959 |
Future of Free Collective Bargaining |
 |
Nov. 04, 1959 |
Featherbedding and Union Work Rules |
 |
Feb. 18, 1959 |
Public Intervention in Labor Disputes |
 |
Jul. 09, 1958 |
Suits Against Labor Unions |
 |
Nov. 13, 1957 |
Right-To-Work Laws |
 |
Oct. 31, 1956 |
Union Organizing |
 |
May 01, 1954 |
State Powers in Labor Relations |
 |
Oct. 02, 1953 |
Toward Labor Unity |
 |
Apr. 11, 1953 |
Industry-Wide Bargaining and Industry-Wide Strikes |
 |
Sep. 03, 1952 |
Labor and Politics |
 |
Mar. 25, 1950 |
Labor Injunctions |
 |
Jan. 25, 1950 |
Trade Unions and Productivity |
 |
Sep. 26, 1949 |
Fact-Finding Boards in Labor Disputes |
 |
Mar. 05, 1949 |
Closed Shop |
 |
Dec. 01, 1948 |
Revision of the Taft-Hartley Act |
 |
Jan. 01, 1947 |
Labor Unions, the Public and the Law |
 |
Oct. 09, 1946 |
Revision of the Wagner Act |
 |
Sep. 25, 1946 |
Labor Productivity |
 |
May 29, 1946 |
Labor Organization in the South |
 |
Jan. 30, 1946 |
Compulsory Settlement of Labor Disputes |
 |
May 18, 1945 |
Labor Policy After the War |
 |
Mar. 29, 1945 |
Union Maintenance |
 |
Feb. 02, 1945 |
Labor Relations in Coal Mining |
 |
Oct. 12, 1944 |
No-Strike Pledge |
 |
Sep. 16, 1944 |
Political Action by Organized Labor |
 |
May 30, 1944 |
Unionization of Foremen |
 |
Apr. 01, 1944 |
Dismissal Pay |
 |
Apr. 29, 1943 |
Labor in Government |
 |
Apr. 09, 1943 |
Public Regulation of Trade Unions |
 |
Nov. 19, 1941 |
Labor Policies of the Roosevelt Administration |
 |
Oct. 23, 1941 |
Closed Shop Issue in Labor Relations |
 |
Mar. 29, 1941 |
Labor as Partner in Production |
 |
Feb. 12, 1941 |
Labor and the Defense Program |
 |
Feb. 23, 1940 |
Labor in Politics |
 |
Jan. 17, 1939 |
Settlement of Disputes Between Labor Unions |
 |
Jul. 01, 1938 |
Three Years of National Labor Relations Act |
 |
Nov. 12, 1937 |
State Regulation of Labor Relations |
 |
Jul. 10, 1937 |
Restrictions on the Right to Strike |
 |
Apr. 28, 1937 |
The Labor Market and the Unemployed |
 |
Mar. 26, 1937 |
Control of the Sit-Down Strike |
 |
Mar. 13, 1937 |
Collective Bargaining in the Soft-Coal Industry |
 |
Jan. 22, 1937 |
Responsibility of Labor Unions |
 |
Nov. 11, 1936 |
Industrial Unionism and the A.F. of L. |
 |
Jul. 30, 1936 |
Federal Intervention in Labor Disputes |
 |
Jul. 14, 1936 |
Labor Relations in the Steel Industry |
 |
Apr. 17, 1934 |
Company Unions and Collective Bargaining |
 |
Feb. 07, 1934 |
Settlement of Labor Disputes |
 |
Sep. 12, 1933 |
Trade Unionism Under the Recovery Program |
 |
Feb. 17, 1932 |
Wage Concessions by Trade Unions |
 |
Oct. 01, 1929 |
Status of the American Labor Movement |
 |
Jul. 20, 1929 |
Trade Unionism in the South |
 |
Aug. 31, 1928 |
Organized Labor in National Politics |
 |
Feb. 04, 1928 |
The Use of Injunctions in Labor Disputes |
 |
Sep. 09, 1927 |
Organized Labor and the Works Council Movement |
 |
Oct. 12, 1923 |
The A.F. of L. and the “New Radicalism” |
| | |
|