Introduction
The Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission legalized unlimited secret donations to political campaigns. Thirteen years later, this so-called “dark money” has become a normal part of U.S. elections, with both parties raising tens of millions in anonymous funds each election cycle. During the 2022 midterms, four dark money groups aligned with Republican or Democratic congressional leaders poured more than $295 million into federal campaigns. Proponents say such large, undisclosed donations protect political donors’ freedom of speech, but critics argue these contributions have enabled the super-wealthy to secretly control U.S. politics. They also warn that it has fostered political corruption, enabled malicious attack ads and provided a gateway for foreign entities to influence American politicians. While polls show U.S. voters overwhelmingly oppose dark money and are dissatisfied with the current campaign finance system, major political, legal and administrative obstacles prevent reform at the federal level. Nevertheless, reformers say, officials are beginning to check the influence of dark money at the state and local levels.
Five years after the U.S. Supreme Court legalized unlimited secret donations to political campaigns, demonstrators outside the White House protest the 2010 decision, which they say gave corporations and the wealthy too much sway over elections. Proponents say it protects donors' free speech rights. (AFP/Getty Images/Nicholas Kamm)
|
|
|
|
 |
Jan. 06, 2023 |
Dark Money |
 |
Mar. 25, 2022 |
The Democrats' Future |
 |
Apr. 30, 2021 |
The GOP's Future |
 |
Oct. 13, 2017 |
Future of the Democratic Party |
 |
Sep. 09, 2016 |
Populism and Party Politics |
 |
Nov. 14, 2014 |
Nonprofit Groups and Partisan Politics |
 |
Oct. 24, 2014 |
Future of the GOP |
 |
Feb. 28, 2014 |
Polarization in America |
 |
Mar. 19, 2010 |
Tea Party Movement  |
 |
Mar. 20, 2009 |
Future of the GOP |
 |
Jun. 08, 2007 |
Democrats in Congress |
 |
Apr. 30, 2004 |
The Partisan Divide |
 |
Dec. 22, 1995 |
Third-Party Prospects |
 |
Jan. 11, 1985 |
Post-1984 Political Landscape |
 |
Nov. 09, 1984 |
Democratic Revival in South America |
 |
Sep. 14, 1984 |
Election 1984 |
 |
Dec. 19, 1980 |
Future of the Democratic Party |
 |
Sep. 29, 1978 |
New Right in American Politics |
 |
Jan. 04, 1974 |
Future of Conservatism |
 |
May 03, 1972 |
The New Populism |
 |
Feb. 02, 1956 |
Foreign Policy in Political Campaigns |
 |
Dec. 22, 1954 |
Divided Government |
 |
Aug. 04, 1952 |
Two-Party System |
 |
Jun. 06, 1952 |
Party Platforms |
 |
Sep. 05, 1951 |
Southern Democrats and the 1952 Election |
 |
Oct. 06, 1948 |
Voting in 1948 |
 |
Aug. 27, 1948 |
Republicans and Foreign Policy |
 |
Jul. 16, 1947 |
Third Party Movements |
 |
Aug. 22, 1940 |
Political Realignments |
 |
Jan. 13, 1938 |
The G. O. P. and the Solid South |
 |
Jul. 22, 1936 |
Third Party Movements in American Politics |
 |
Jul. 07, 1936 |
The Monopoly Issue in Party Politics |
 |
Nov. 12, 1935 |
Party Platforms and the 1936 Campaign |
 |
May 18, 1934 |
Political Trends and New Party Movements |
 |
Jan. 13, 1932 |
National Party Platforms, 1832–1932 |
 |
May 16, 1928 |
Third Party Movements |
 |
Jan. 21, 1928 |
Major Party Platforms 1924–1928 |
 |
Nov. 14, 1924 |
The Election and the Third Party |
 |
Sep. 05, 1924 |
Party Claims and Past Political Complexion of the States |
 |
Jun. 25, 1924 |
Third Party Platforms |
 |
Jun. 18, 1924 |
Thrid Parties: Past and Prospective |
| | |
|