Clean Energy Transition

November 12, 2021 • Volume 31, Issue 40
Is Biden's aggressive agenda feasible?
By Reed Karaim


President Biden has outlined an ambitious agenda to transform the United States from a country that depends significantly on fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and gas, to one that operates almost completely on clean, largely renewable energy. The effort is in response to the scientific consensus that climate change is having a damaging impact on the United States and the world. Biden's plan would cut greenhouse gas emissions, which are raising the planet's average temperature and sea levels and contributing to severe weather. The goal is to reach net-zero U.S. emissions by no later than 2050. Supporters of Biden's agenda say it is technologically feasible, economically beneficial and essential to staving off an environmental disaster. But critics say Biden's aggressive timeline to make changes in everything from power generation to the cars Americans drive will cost trillions of dollars, cause severe economic disruption and job losses and overstates the severity of climate change.

Photo of President Biden speaking about climate change in Glasgow, Scotland, on November 2, 2021. (Getty Images/Jeff J. Mitchell)
President Biden warns of the threat posed by climate change in remarks at the U.N. climate talks in Glasgow, Scotland. While the U.S. has committed to net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, skeptics argue that meeting such a target would plunge the country into an economic tailspin. (Getty Images/Jeff J. Mitchell)
ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Jan. 13, 2023  Energy Warfare
Nov. 18, 2022  Geopolitics of Green Energy
Nov. 12, 2021  Clean Energy Transition
Jul. 19, 2018  Energy Policy
Aug. 02, 2017  Energy Policy
Nov. 11, 2016  Protecting the Power Grid
Apr. 29, 2016  Solar Energy Controversies
Jun. 05, 2015  Energy
Dec. 16, 2011  Fracking Controversy
May 20, 2011  Energy Policy
Apr. 01, 2011  Wind Power
Jul. 24, 2009  Energy and Climate
May 19, 2006  Energy Efficiency
Feb. 01, 2002  Energy Security
May 25, 2001  Energy Policy
Mar. 03, 2000  Energy and the Environment
Mar. 05, 1999  The Politics of Energy
Oct. 12, 1990  Energy Policy: Options for the 1990s
Jan. 30, 1981  Energy Policy: The New Administration
May 25, 1979  Public Confidence and Energy
Apr. 05, 1974  Continental Energy Sharing
Dec. 29, 1965  Electric Power Supply and Regulation
Air Pollution
Bilateral and Regional Trade
Campaigns and Elections
Climate Change
Congress Actions
Consumer Behavior
Consumer Protection and Product Liability
Economic Development
Electric Power
Energy and the Environment
Energy Conservation
Energy Policy
Export Sanctions and Restrictions
General Employment and Labor
General International Relations
Hazardous Substances and Nuclear Waste
Internet and Social Media
Manufacturing and Industrial Production
Mineral Industries
Motor Traffic and Roads
Nuclear Energy
Oil and Natural Gas
Party Politics
Party Politics
Powers and History of the Presidency
Regulation and Deregulation
Renewable Energy Resources and Alternative Fuels
Science and Politics
Unemployment and Employment Programs
United Nations