Introduction
Vermont nurse Lynne Caulfield, whose husband Jack (pictured) died of cancer, opposes physician-assisted suicide. “It is a sad day when our lawyers are asking health care professionals to help [people] die rather than extending compassionate care to ease pain and suffering,” she told state lawmakers, who approved the procedure on May 13. (AP Photo/Jason R. Henske)
|
Decisions about sustaining life, allowing it to end or even hastening death are among the most difficult choices terminally ill patients and their families can face. Such decisions also are at the heart of a debate about what is commonly called “physician-assisted suicide” — or “aid-in-dying” by supporters. Oregon and Washington — and now likely Vermont — allow physicians to write a prescription for lethal drugs if requested by someone who is terminally ill and mentally competent. A Montana court also has allowed the procedure. Supporters of assisted suicide say it allows the terminally ill to avoid unnecessary suffering and meet death on their own terms, and they say safeguards in the laws prevent abuse of the procedure. But opponents say assisted suicide devalues life, opens patients to exploitation by relatives or others and could lead to widespread euthanasia of the sick and vulnerable.
|
|
|
 |
Nov. 01, 2013 |
Religious Repression |
 |
May 17, 2013 |
Assisted Suicide |
 |
Oct. 16, 2012 |
Human Trafficking and Slavery |
 |
Sep. 20, 2011 |
Saving Indigenous Peoples |
 |
Oct. 30, 2009 |
Human Rights Issues |
 |
Jul. 25, 2008 |
Human Rights in China |
 |
Mar. 26, 2004 |
Human Trafficking and Slavery |
 |
Apr. 30, 1999 |
Women and Human Rights |
 |
Nov. 13, 1998 |
Human Rights |
 |
Jul. 19, 1985 |
Human Rights in the 1980s |
 |
May 18, 1979 |
Human Rights Policy |
 |
Apr. 03, 1968 |
Human Rights Protection |
 |
Mar. 21, 1956 |
Forced Labor and Slavery |
 |
Apr. 27, 1949 |
Forced Labor |
 |
Jan. 25, 1945 |
Bills of Rights |
| | |
|