Pork Barrel Politics

June 16, 2006 • Volume 16, Issue 23
Do earmarks lead to waste and corruption?
By Marcia Clemmitt

Introduction

Former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, R-Calif., apologizes on Nov. 28, 2005, after pleading guilty to taking $2.4 million in bribes to sponsor defense-related earmarks. He was sentenced to more than eight years in federal prison.  (AP Photo/Lenny Ignelzi)
Former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, R-Calif., apologizes on Nov. 28, 2005, after pleading guilty to taking $2.4 million in bribes to sponsor defense-related earmarks. He was sentenced to more than eight years in federal prison. (AP Photo/Lenny Ignelzi)

Ever since the country was founded, congressional lawmakers have curried favor with hometown voters by providing funds — known as earmarks — for local projects and favored firms. Recently, however, the number of earmarks has skyrocketed from 2,000 projects worth $10.6 billion in 1998 to 15,584 items totaling $32.7 billion in 2004. Defenders of such spending argue it aids valuable local projects like parks and after-school programs that might otherwise go unfunded. But critics warn that such pork barrel politics also fuels corruption. Former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, R-Calif., recently pleaded guilty to accepting $2.4 million in bribes to direct earmarked funds to defense contractors. Opponents of uncontrolled earmarking also complain that local “pork” projects take funds away from national needs. A current defense spending bill, for example, would divert money from troop support and other Pentagon priorities to local defense contractors for lower-priority projects.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Ethics in Government
Jan. 31, 2014  Whistleblowers
Feb. 18, 2011  Lies and Politics
Apr. 30, 2010  Gridlock in Washington
Jun. 22, 2007  Prosecutors and Politics
Jun. 16, 2006  Pork Barrel Politics
May 07, 1999  Independent Counsels Re-Examined
Feb. 21, 1997  Independent Counsels
May 27, 1994  Political Scandals
Apr. 06, 1979  Assassinations Investigation
Dec. 05, 1973  Presidential Impeachment
May 16, 1973  Ethics in Government
May 10, 1961  Secret Societies and Political Action
Jun. 29, 1960  Conflicts of Interest
Oct. 26, 1955  Businessmen in Government
Apr. 07, 1954  Fair Investigations
Apr. 25, 1952  Congressional Immunity
Dec. 05, 1951  Ethics in Government
Jan. 28, 1948  Individual Rights and Congressional Investigations
Jul. 02, 1934  Political Reform and Federal Patronage
Mar. 07, 1924  Congressional Extravagance and the Budget
Nov. 12, 1923  Issues Developed in the Teapot Dome Inquiry
BROWSE RELATED TOPICS:
Investigations and Discipline
Lobbying and Special Interests