Zero Tolerance for School Violence

March 10, 2000 • Volume 10, Issue 9
Is mandatory punishment in schools unfair?
By Kathy Koch

Introduction

First-grader Timiere Crosby, here with his mother, was expelled for a month this year for bringing nail clippers with a two-inch blade to school in York, Pa. (Photo Credit: AP Photo/Bill Kalina)
First-grader Timiere Crosby, here with his mother, was expelled for a month this year for bringing nail clippers with a two-inch blade to school in York, Pa. (Photo Credit: AP Photo/Bill Kalina)

Aseries of schoolyard mass killings in recent years has prompted school officials and lawmakers to impose mandatory punishments for a multitude of misbehaviors, many of them seemingly minor. Proponents credit tough disciplinary policies with driving school crime rates down. But critics question their effectiveness and worry about the impact the policies are having on individual rights. And civil rights advocates say the policies are being used to kick out minority, disabled and academically challenged students who might drag down standardized test scores. But the latest school violence -- the shooting of a Michigan first-grader on Feb. 29 by another 6-year-old -- left little doubt that zero-tolerance policies will remain in force.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Violence in Schools
Feb. 15, 2008  Discipline in Schools
Feb. 04, 2005  Bullying
Jan. 09, 2004  Hazing
Mar. 10, 2000  Zero Tolerance for School Violence
Oct. 09, 1998  School Violence
Sep. 11, 1992  Violence in Schools
Aug. 13, 1976  Violence in the Schools
BROWSE RELATED TOPICS:
Crime and Law Enforcement
Diversity Issues
Elementary and Secondary Education
Students and Social Life