Report Outline
Special Focus
Overview
The fate of the most promising superpower arms control negotiations in years may depend as much on London, Paris and Bonn as on Washington and Moscow. The three-day talks in Moscow between Secretary of State George P. Shultz and Foreign Minister Eduard A. Shevardnadze and Shultz' meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev ended April 15 with optimistic predictions on both sides of an early agreement on the removal of medium-range nuclear missiles from Europe. Tass, the official Soviet news agency, called the talks “timely and useful,” while Shultz said that” very considerable headway” had been made, adding that “it should be possible to work out an agreement.”
But the secretary of state stressed that acceptance of a new Soviet proposal to eliminate short-range nuclear missiles would depend on the consent of America's West European allies. “We are a member of a strong alliance and on matters of this importance. of course, we don't respond immediately,” he said, “We consult carefully with our allies.” Shultz went directly to Brussels to discuss the proposal with America's increasingly skittish European allies. who are concerned that a reduction in U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe would leave it vulnerable to Soviet conventional forces and weaken nuclear deterrence.
Indeed, the vision of a nuclear-free world is sending shock waves through the continent. Fearful that the United States may decouple its strategic interests from those of Europe, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher dismissed that vision as “a dream” when she visited Moscow several weeks ago. “You cannot base a sure defense on dreams.” she told Gorbachev. who has proposed that all nuclear weapons be eliminated within the next 10–15 years. President Reagan, who initially welcomed Gorbachev's proposal during their October 1986 summit in Reykjavik, Iceland, has since backed away from the idea. |
|
Weapons of Mass Destruction |
|
 |
Jul. 29, 2016 |
Modernizing the Nuclear Arsenal |
 |
Mar. 08, 2002 |
Weapons of Mass Destruction |
 |
Jan. 31, 1997 |
Chemical and Biological Weapons |
 |
Jun. 24, 1994 |
Nuclear Arms Cleanup |
 |
Jun. 05, 1992 |
Nuclear Proliferation |
 |
Jun. 29, 1990 |
Obstacles to Bio-Chemical Disarmament |
 |
Apr. 22, 1988 |
The Military Build-Down in the 1990s |
 |
May 24, 1987 |
Euromissile Negotiations |
 |
Jul. 11, 1986 |
Chemical Weapons |
 |
Apr. 27, 1984 |
Reagan's Defense Buildup |
 |
Jun. 04, 1982 |
Civil Defense |
 |
Jul. 17, 1981 |
Controlling Nuclear Proliferation |
 |
Jun. 05, 1981 |
MX Missile Decision |
 |
Aug. 15, 1980 |
The Neutron Bomb and European Defense |
 |
Sep. 07, 1979 |
Atomic Secrecy |
 |
Mar. 17, 1978 |
Nuclear Proliferation |
 |
May 27, 1977 |
Chemical-Biological Warfare |
 |
May 13, 1977 |
Politics of Strategic Arms Negotiations |
 |
Nov. 15, 1974 |
Nuclear Safeguards |
 |
Jul. 01, 1970 |
Nuclear Balance of Terror: 25 Years After Alamogordo |
 |
Jun. 18, 1969 |
Chemical–Biological Weaponry |
 |
Jun. 30, 1965 |
Atomic Proliferation |
 |
Mar. 21, 1962 |
Nuclear Testing Dilemmas |
 |
Aug. 16, 1961 |
Shelters and Survival |
 |
Oct. 12, 1959 |
Chemical-Biological Warfare |
 |
May 13, 1959 |
Nuclear Test Ban |
 |
Dec. 04, 1957 |
Scientific Cooperation and Atlantic Security |
 |
May 15, 1957 |
Changing Defense Concepts |
 |
Jul. 03, 1956 |
Civil Defense, 1956 |
 |
Nov. 16, 1955 |
International Arms Deals |
 |
Oct. 04, 1954 |
Industrial Defense |
 |
Apr. 15, 1954 |
National Defense Strategy |
 |
Feb. 10, 1954 |
New Aproaches to Atomic Control |
 |
Oct. 10, 1953 |
Atomic Information |
 |
Apr. 11, 1952 |
Biological Warfare |
 |
Oct. 03, 1951 |
World Arms Race |
 |
Feb. 04, 1948 |
International Control of Atomic Energy |
 |
Dec. 06, 1946 |
International Inspection |
 |
Aug. 27, 1943 |
Gas Warfare |
 |
Jul. 24, 1937 |
The New Race in Armaments |
 |
May 05, 1932 |
Abolition of Aggressive Weapons |
|
|