Encounter Groups

March 3, 1971

Report Outline
Rapid Growth of Encounter Groups
Quarter-Century of Group Development
Problems and Promise in Encounter Work

Rapid Growth of Encounter Groups

Hopes and Fears Over Movement's Popularity

The rapid growth of the encounter group movement has raised serious questions about the efficacy and even the hazards of a wholesale plunge by millions of Americans into consciousness raising and sensitivity stimulation, as it is now practiced in many places all over the country. The questioning, however, is seldom critical of the basic principles of the encounter group process, which are grounded in the findings of the behavioral sciences. It is the rare critic who does not find something to praise in the group encounter procedure, provided it is properly conducted; that is, if it is supervised by a qualified leader, if the participants are screened to eliminate those who might be hurt by the experience, and if the process is directed toward specific and reasonable goals.

Many see in the encounter group a great potential for improving human relations and thus for reducing social tensions. Much hope rests with its yet-unproved usefulness for creating a bridge of mutual sympathy between hostile groups: between blacks and whites, police and community, elders and youth. The most enthusiastic of its adherents believe the encounter group holds a key to the creation of a better society composed of more joyous and lovable human beings. Others make more modest claims for it: that it teaches individuals how to work and live more satisfactorily with others—on the job, in the home, and in society. Still others dismiss the encounter group movement as a mere cult. And there are some who condemn it as immoral and anti-American.

Concern over the development of encounter groups applies largely to the lack of legal or professional controls over their operations. The door, unfortunately, is wide open for charlatans and misguided amateurs. Their appeal is all the more insidious in view of the vulnerability of the troubled, the emotionally unstable, and other persons with problems that might more suitably be brought to the attention of a psychiatrist or a family counselor.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Mental Health
Jul. 01, 2022  Youth Mental Health
Jul. 31, 2020  COVID-19 and Mental Health
Oct. 11, 2019  The Insanity Defense
Jul. 12, 2019  Suicide Crisis
Mar. 13, 2015  Prisoners and Mental Illness
Dec. 05, 2014  Treating Schizophrenia
Sep. 12, 2014  Teen Suicide
May 10, 2013  Mental Health Policy
Aug. 03, 2012  Treating ADHD
Jun. 01, 2012  Traumatic Brain Injury
Jun. 26, 2009  Treating Depression
Feb. 13, 2004  Youth Suicide
Feb. 06, 2004  Mental Illness Medication Debate
Mar. 29, 2002  Mental Health Insurance
Feb. 08, 2002  Treating Anxiety
Jul. 16, 1999  Childhood Depression
Jun. 18, 1999  Boys' Emotional Needs
Sep. 12, 1997  Mental Health Policy
Aug. 19, 1994  Prozac
Aug. 06, 1993  Mental Illness
Oct. 09, 1992  Depression
Jun. 14, 1991  Teenage Suicide
Jul. 08, 1988  Biology Invades Psychology
Feb. 13, 1987  The Mentally Ill
Aug. 20, 1982  Mental Health Care Reappraisal
Jun. 12, 1981  Youth Suicide
Sep. 21, 1979  Mental Health Care
Sep. 15, 1978  Brain Research
Jul. 05, 1974  Psychomedicine
Aug. 08, 1973  Emotionally Disturbed Children
Dec. 27, 1972  Mental Depression
Mar. 24, 1972  Schizophrenia: Medical Enigma
Apr. 21, 1971  Approaches to Death
Mar. 03, 1971  Encounter Groups
Nov. 25, 1970  Psychological Counseling of Students
Feb. 19, 1969  Future of Psychiatry
Feb. 02, 1966  New Approaches to Mental Illness
Jan. 22, 1964  Insanity as a Defense
Sep. 25, 1963  Anatomy of Suicide
Nov. 20, 1957  Drugs and Mental Health
Apr. 23, 1954  Mental Health Programs
Jul. 09, 1948  Mental Health
Mental Health
Popular Culture