Report Outline
Rapid Vs. Restrained Commercial Exploitation
Scientific Foundations of Television
Television in Europe and the United States
Rapid Vs. Restrained Commercial Exploitation
Television Policies of Communication Commissions
The Question whether the radio industry shall be permitted to undertake full-scale commercial development of television before the close of the war, or whether such development shall be delayed pending further advances in the art, is now awaiting decision by the Federal Communications Commission. Shortages of labor and materials, added to the demands of the armed forces for communications equipment, have prevented any notable expansion in this field during the last three years. With the war on its way to being won, the F. C. C. is now being urged to set aside present restraints and permit immediate exploitation of the possibilities of television on a national scale. It is argued that such a policy, in addition to providing employment for the transition period, would permit advance development of an advertising medium which promises to be highly effective in creating quick markets for new and unfamiliar goods.
Until some six months before the United States entered the present war, the F. C. C. followed a generally conservative policy in regard to the commercial expansion of television, and repeatedly emphasized the need for continued research. In February, 1940, the commission issued regulations permitting “limited commercialization,” but when the Radio Corporation of America began an advertising campaign to sell receiving sets to the public at prices ranging up to $395, the commission warned that the receivers might quickly become obsolete and that “economic loss to the public … would be occasioned by premature purchase in a rapidly advancing field.” Television, it said, was here to stay, but today's receivers might conceivably be outmoded tomorrow.
James L. Fly, chairman of the commission, elaborated the reasons for caution in a radio address in April, 1940. In the case of broadcasts of sound, he said, there had been no change in the fundamental standards for transmission and reception since radio came into use twenty years earlier. “A receiver built to receive a broadcasting station operating in 1920 will receive a station that operates in 1940.” |
|
|
 |
Feb. 19, 2021 |
Hollywood and COVID-19 |
 |
Apr. 11, 2014 |
Future of TV |
 |
Nov. 09, 2012 |
Indecency on Television |
 |
Aug. 27, 2010 |
Reality TV |
 |
Jun. 20, 2008 |
Transition to Digital TV |
 |
Feb. 16, 2007 |
Television's Future |
 |
Mar. 18, 2005 |
Celebrity Culture |
 |
Oct. 29, 1999 |
Public Broadcasting |
 |
Aug. 15, 1997 |
Children's Television |
 |
Dec. 23, 1994 |
The Future of Television |
 |
Mar. 26, 1993 |
TV Violence |
 |
Sep. 18, 1992 |
Public Broadcasting |
 |
Oct. 04, 1991 |
Pay-Per-View |
 |
Feb. 17, 1989 |
A High-Tech, High-Stakes HDTV Gamble |
 |
Dec. 27, 1985 |
Cable Television Coming of Age |
 |
Sep. 07, 1984 |
New Era in TV Sports |
 |
Sep. 24, 1982 |
Cable TV's Future |
 |
Apr. 24, 1981 |
Public Broadcasting's Uncertain Future |
 |
May 09, 1980 |
Television in the Eighties |
 |
Oct. 25, 1972 |
Public Broadcasting in Britain and America |
 |
Mar. 26, 1971 |
Video Revolution: Cassettes and Recorders |
 |
Sep. 09, 1970 |
Cable Television: The Coming Medium |
 |
May 15, 1968 |
Television and Politics |
 |
Mar. 01, 1967 |
Financing of Educational TV |
 |
Dec. 16, 1964 |
Community Antenna Television |
 |
Oct. 21, 1964 |
Sports on Television |
 |
Feb. 28, 1962 |
Expansion of Educational Television |
 |
Aug. 28, 1957 |
Television in the Schools |
 |
Jan. 18, 1957 |
Movie-TV Competition |
 |
Sep. 06, 1955 |
Television and the 1956 Campaign |
 |
May 18, 1954 |
Educational Television |
 |
Sep. 03, 1953 |
Changing Fortunes of the Movie Business |
 |
Apr. 20, 1953 |
Televising Congress |
 |
May 31, 1951 |
Television in Education |
 |
Jan. 26, 1949 |
Television Boom |
 |
Jul. 12, 1944 |
Television |
| | |
|