Report Summary June 12, 2009
 Current Issue Cover Photo

Legalizing Marijuana
Should pot be treated like alcohol and taxed?
By Peter Katel

From statehouses to the White House, attitudes toward marijuana laws are changing. California's top tax collector is endorsing proposed state legislation to legalize and tax pot, and Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger says he'd like the idea debated. More than a dozen other states have enacted or are considering laws to permit medical-marijuana use or remove criminal penalties for possession. In. . . .

Read the Full Report (Subscription Required)
Buy Report PDF PDF


The Issues


Pro/Con
Does permitting medical marijuana amount to “back-door legalization” of pot?

Pro Pro
John Lovell
Legislative Counsel, California Narcotic Officers Association. Written for CQ Researcher, June 8, 2009
Bruce Mirken
Director of communications, Marijuana Policy Project. Written for CQ Researcher, June 6, 2009


Spotlight
“And the state hasn't gone to hell.”

Some states are cautious about medical marijuana. They limit the number of marijuana “prescriptions” that one doctor can write, prohibit the opening of supply outlets, and permit only sufferers from certain specific illnesses to qualify. Footnote 1

Seen from California, such precautions can look a little timid. In the Golden State, where the modern medical-marijuana era began with a law passed by voter initiative in 1996, medical marijuana is available from hundreds of storefront “dispensaries” and has spawned a large market in cannabis grown for these outlets.

At least 200,000 Californians are authorized medical-marijuana users, according to Americans for Safe Access, an Oakland-based medical-marijuana advocacy organization. Footnote 2 “Certainly in Northern California, well over 1 percent of the adult population are medical-marijuana users, in some places 2 percent,” says Dale Gieringer, veteran state coordinator for California NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws).

Law-enforcement officials concede that Californians on the whole support the system as it's developed. Yet that system and the state laws that underpin it fly in the face of federal law prohibiting sale, possession and use of cannabis, law-enforcement authorities argue. But the Obama administration's new policy of deferring to state medical-marijuana laws was followed by a California law-enforcement defeat on medical marijuana in the U.S. Supreme Court.

In May, the high court declined to consider a challenge to California's law that was based on its inconsistency with federal law. San Diego and San Bernardino counties had pursued that argument unsuccessfully through California state courts. The U.S. Supreme Court turned down without comment the counties' appeal of a California Supreme Court decision. Footnote 3

But an attorney representing the California Police Chiefs Association maintains that city governments are still prohibited from violating federal law. “Since distribution of marijuana violates federal law,” Martin J. Mayer wrote in a May memo to all police chiefs and sheriffs, “passing a zoning ordinance which, for example, only allows such operations to be conducted in the industrial or commercial zone of a city, would still be in violation of the laws of the United States and, therefore, prohibited.” Footnote 4

So far, that argument hasn't carried much weight with California's cities and counties. “The limited legal protections afforded to pot growers and dispensary owners have turned marijuana cultivation and distribution in California into a classic 'gray area' business, like gambling or strip clubs, which are tolerated or not, to varying degrees, depending on where you live and on how aggressive your local sheriff is feeling that afternoon,” David Samuels of The New Yorker reported last year in a long, from-the-inside look at the state's marijuana industry. Footnote 5

Since then, the “gray area” has expanded. In June, the Los Angeles Times reported that at least 600 medical-marijuana “dispensaries” — many if not most of them storefronts — are operating in Los Angeles County alone. They've proliferated because of a loophole in a city moratorium on new dispensaries. A hardship exemption allows outlets that opened after the moratorium began to keep running while the City Council prepares a comprehensive ordinance. That project has been under way for more than a year. Footnote 6

Some in law enforcement argue that dispensaries are illegal even under the state medical-marijuana law. Storefront outlets aren't mentioned either in the 1996 law that voters passed nor in the 2004 law designed to provide further specifications of how the medical-marijuana system would operate, medical-marijuana advocates acknowledge. Footnote 7

The law does mention that nonprofit cooperatives can supply marijuana. California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. concluded in formal guidelines issued last year that dispensaries could meet legal requirements as long as they could prove they weren't making profits, nor allowing any pot to enter the non-medical market. Footnote 8

Joshua Braun (Getty Images/Rod Rolle)
Joshua Braun sells numerous varieties of marijuana at his HortiPharm Caregivers dispensary in Santa Barbara, Calif. (Getty Images/Rod Rolle)

The guidelines also said that cooperatives shouldn't buy cannabis from non-members. California NORML, which has played an active role in the evolution of the medical-marijuana system, challenges that conclusion. But, NORML adds, “In practice, this restriction can be easily avoided by simply enrolling all outside vendors as members of the collective.” Footnote 9

But that approach doesn't look so kosher to police.

“Too often 'medical marijuana' has been used as a smokescreen for those who want to legalize it and profit off it, and storefront dispensaries established as cover for selling an illegal substance for a lucrative return,” the California Police Chiefs Association says in a 2009 “white paper” on dispensaries. Footnote 10

The paper also concedes that protests haven't erupted, which in turn influences city and county officials. “Because the majority of their citizens have been sympathetic and projected a favorable attitude toward medical-marijuana patients, and have been tolerant of the cultivation and use of marijuana, public officials . . . have taken a hands-off attitude.”

The public acceptance may reflect the fact that marijuana use hasn't exploded in the state's high schools — though, to be sure, the level is relatively high. The California attorney general's most recent annual survey of high-school students reported that since 2003, the share of students who have smoked pot in the previous six months has remained stable, at about 20 percent for ninth-graders and 31 percent for 11th-graders. Footnote 11

“One of the most disturbing findings of the current survey is, among older students, recreational use of diverted (not prescribed by physicians) prescription painkillers ranks highest in illegal use behind marijuana,” the report said.

In short, says Ellen Komp, a spokeswoman for California NORML, the medical-marijuana system is providing cannabis to patients without causing social disruption.

“Dispensaries are operating in neighborhoods,” she says, “and the state hasn't gone to hell.”

[1] “Active State Medical Marijuana Programs,” National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#top.

Footnote:
1. “Active State Medical Marijuana Programs,” National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3391#top.

[2] “Activist Newsletter,” Americans for Safe Access, March 2009, p. 2, www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/ASA_mar09_newsletter.pdf.

Footnote:
2. “Activist Newsletter,” Americans for Safe Access, March 2009, p. 2, www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/ASA_mar09_newsletter.pdf.

[3] David G. Savage, “Justices reject California appeals on medical pot,” Los Angeles Times, May 19, 2009, p. 19.

Footnote:
3. David G. Savage, “Justices reject California appeals on medical pot,” Los Angeles Times, May 19, 2009, p. 19.

[4] Martin J. Mayer, “Client Alert Memorandum,” California Police Chiefs Association, May 19, 2009, www.californiapolicechiefs.org/nav_files/marijuana_files/vol_24_no_14_may_09.pdf.

Footnote:
4. Martin J. Mayer, “Client Alert Memorandum,” California Police Chiefs Association, May 19, 2009, www.californiapolicechiefs.org/nav_files/marijuana_files/vol_24_no_14_may_09.pdf.

[5] David Samuels, “Dr. Kush: How Medical Marijuana Is Transforming the Pot Industry,” The New Yorker, July 28, 2008.

Footnote:
5. David Samuels, “Dr. Kush: How Medical Marijuana Is Transforming the Pot Industry,” The New Yorker, July 28, 2008.

[6] John Hoeffel, “L.A.'s medical pot dispensary moratorium led to a boom instead,” Los Angeles Times, June 3, 2009, www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-medical-marijuana3-2009jun03,0,6866563,full.story.

Footnote:
6. John Hoeffel, “L.A.'s medical pot dispensary moratorium led to a boom instead,” Los Angeles Times, June 3, 2009, www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-medical-marijuana3-2009jun03,0,6866563,full.story.

[7] “California NORML Advice for Medical Marijuana Providers,” California NORML, April 2009, www.canorml.org/prop/collectivetips.html.

Footnote:
7. “California NORML Advice for Medical Marijuana Providers,” California NORML, April 2009, www.canorml.org/prop/collectivetips.html.

[8] “Guidelines for the Security and Non-Diversion of Marijuana Grown for Medical Use,” California Department of Justice, August 2008, http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/press/pdfs/n1601_medicalmarijuanaguidelines.pdf.

Footnote:
8. “Guidelines for the Security and Non-Diversion of Marijuana Grown for Medical Use,” California Department of Justice, August 2008, http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/press/pdfs/n1601_medicalmarijuanaguidelines.pdf.

[9] “New AG Guidelines Don't Substantially Conflict With Previous Guidelines,” California NORML, Aug. 27, 2008, www.canorml.org/news/AGguides.html.

Footnote:
9. “New AG Guidelines Don't Substantially Conflict With Previous Guidelines,” California NORML, Aug. 27, 2008, www.canorml.org/news/AGguides.html.

[10] “White Paper on Marijuana Dispensaries,' California Police Chiefs Association, April 2009, p. vi, www.californiapolicechiefs.org/nav_files/marijuana_files/MarijuanaDispensariesWhitePaper_042209.pdf.

Footnote:
10. “White Paper on Marijuana Dispensaries,' California Police Chiefs Association, April 2009, p. vi, www.californiapolicechiefs.org/nav_files/marijuana_files/MarijuanaDispensariesWhitePaper_042209.pdf.

[11] Gregory Austin and Rodney Skager, “Highlights, 12th Biennial California Student Survey, Drug, Alcohol and Tobacco Use, 2007-2008,” California Attorney General's Office, winter 2008, pp. 10, 24, http://safestate.org/documents/CSS_12th_Highlights_Report.pdf.

Footnote:
11. Gregory Austin and Rodney Skager, “Highlights, 12th Biennial California Student Survey, Drug, Alcohol and Tobacco Use, 2007-2008,” California Attorney General's Office, winter 2008, pp. 10, 24, http://safestate.org/documents/CSS_12th_Highlights_Report.pdf.


Document Citation
Katel, P. (2009, June 12). Legalizing marijuana. CQ Researcher, 19, 525-548. Retrieved from http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/
Document ID: cqresrre2009061200
Document URL: http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre2009061200


Issue Tracker for Related Reports
Drug Abuse and Trafficking
Jun. 03, 2011  Teen Drug Use
Jun. 12, 2009  Legalizing MarijuanaUpdated
Dec. 12, 2008  Mexico's Drug War
Feb. 09, 2007  Combating Addiction
Jun. 02, 2006  War on Drugs
Jul. 15, 2005  Methamphetamine
Jul. 28, 2000  Drug-Policy Debate
Nov. 20, 1998  Drug Testing
Jan. 06, 1995  Treating Addiction
Mar. 19, 1993  War on Drugs
Feb. 23, 1990  Does the War on Drugs Need a New Strategy?
May 20, 1988  The Business of Illicit Drugs
Jan. 23, 1987  Experimental Drugs
Feb. 08, 1985  The Fight Against Drug Smuggling
Aug. 27, 1982  Cocaine: Drug of the Eighties
Jun. 11, 1982  Prescription-Drug Abuse
Jan. 23, 1976  Changing U.S. Drug Policy
Dec. 13, 1972  World Drug Traffic
May 27, 1970  Heroin Addiction
Jan. 27, 1965  Psychotoxic Drugs
Jul. 18, 1962  Narcotics Addiction: Punishment or Treatment
Sep. 05, 1956  Control of Drug Addiction
Mar. 28, 1951  Drug Addiction

Browse Related Topics
Drug Abuse
Substance Abuse