Report Summary March 27, 2009
 Current Issue Cover Photo

Future of Journalism
Will newspapers' decline weaken democracy?
By Tom Price

Thomas Jefferson once famously remarked that if he had to choose between government without newspapers or newspapers without government, he wouldn't hesitate to preserve newspapers. Today, however, newspapers across the country are declining in circulation, advertising and profitability. Some are ceasing to publish. Others are reducing or closing Washington and state-capital bureaus, laying off staff. . . .

Read the Full Report (Subscription Required)
Buy Report PDF PDF


The Issues


Pro/Con
Should newspapers shut down their presses?

Pro Pro
James Moore
Media consultant and Co-author, Bush's Brain. Written for CQ Researcher, March 2009
John F. Sturm
President and CEO, Newspaper Association of America. Written for CQ Researcher, March 2009


Spotlight
  1. Broader coverage offsets loss of journalistic competition.

Hard-driving newsmen Ben Hecht and Charles MacArthur have to be spinning in their graves. Their celebrated 1928 play, The Front Page, depicted the cutthroat competition they experienced as Chicago newspaper reporters, when numerous dailies fought to break the news first.

Today Chicago has just two dailies, both facing severe financial challenges. Most cities have one, and many could lose that newspaper as well. And a growing number of surviving papers are looking to cooperate rather than compete in order to cut costs.

The eight largest newspapers in Ohio have agreed to share their staffs' work. So have Florida's Miami Herald, St. Petersburg Times, Palm Beach Post and (Fort Lauderdale) Sun Sentinel. Even The Washington Post, one of America's very best — and most competitive — papers, has begun to cooperate with the neighboring Baltimore Sun.

The Ohio papers share each other's stories and coordinate their state government coverage. During the 2008 political campaign, the papers conducted a joint polling project. The papers are scattered around the state and don't have a great deal of overlapping readership, their editors say.

The arrangement enables each newspaper to provide more information to its readers than it could on its own, Dayton Daily News Editor Kevin Riley says.

“We could have sat around and complained that none of us could afford to have any polling,” he explains. “Instead, we got a statewide poll that cost us more than any one paper would have been able to pay.”

The Daily News no longer covers Ohio State football, using Columbus Dispatch reporting instead. The Dispatch carries Daily News coverage of the Cincinnati Reds.

In Florida, The Herald and Times have created a joint, six-reporter state capital bureau. The Herald, Post and Sun Sentinel have entered an agreement to share routine coverage in order to free reporters for more enterprise reporting. With Florida International University, they created the South Florida News Service, through which journalism students will produce video and audio content for the three newspapers as well as stories. Footnote 1

The Washington-Baltimore agreement covers routine reporting about Maryland, but not state government or University of Maryland sports, where The Post and Sun continue to compete. Footnote 2

The agreements have raised concerns about loss of journalistic competition.

“It could be a good thing,” Florida state Sen. Dan Gelber said about the arrangements in his state. “But I do worry. I'm a big believer that there needs to be plenty of competition. A vibrant press corps in our state's capital is crucial.” Footnote 3

“If you have fewer people covering things,” Ohio University journalism Professor Patrick Washburn says, “you have fewer viewpoints, and fewer viewpoints is not good.” A politician can “spin” one reporter to get his views across easier than he can spin several, Washburn adds.

“I think competition makes us better, because it creates more diversity of viewpoints and makes us work harder” says Andrew Alexander, The Washington Post's ombudsman. He worries that quality may decline “when there's no urgency to beat the other guy or to go deeper than someone else.”

On the other hand, he adds, “I sympathize with the editors. If you don't have enough staff to cover the local school board meeting, you have to make a choice.”

Riley acknowledges that editors and reporters need to be aware of the pitfalls of diminished competition and have to “challenge ourselves to make sure we're doing our job and serving the public good.” But, he adds, competition is not necessarily valuable when it leads eight reporters to do the same routine story.

“When that could be done with one and the others could be working on enterprise stories with more importance, you're not being smart,” he says. “We could have that group of reporters covering more ground.”

Similarly, Miami Herald Editor Anders Gyllenhaal said the Florida cooperation “helps us focus on 100 percent more enterprise.” Footnote 4 In announcing the agreements, The Herald promised readers “more deep and probing stories on the important issues across Florida.” The arrangements “increase our ability to look beyond the news, to take on investigative projects and to do the kind of explanatory work that is particularly important at the state government level.” Footnote 5

Journalism consultant Michele McLellan endorsed the cooperation and predicted more will come.

“Sure, it's important to have more than one watchdog on duty at the statehouse,” she said. “But too often the watchdogs became the herd, covering the same hearings, writing up the same turn-of-screw procedural votes, and capturing the same political skirmishes that never quite enlighten real motivations or inform about policy.” Footnote 6

[1] “New Tallahassee Bureau Expands Our Coverage,” The Miami Herald, Dec. 7, 2008, p. L1.

Footnote:
1. “New Tallahassee Bureau Expands Our Coverage,” The Miami Herald, Dec. 7, 2008, p. L1.

[2] Michael S. Rosenwald, “Washington Post, Baltimore Sun to Share Content,” The Washington Post, Dec. 23, 2008, p. D3.

Footnote:
2. Michael S. Rosenwald, “Washington Post, Baltimore Sun to Share Content,” The Washington Post, Dec. 23, 2008, p. D3.

[3] “New Tallahassee Bureau Expands Our Coverage,” op. cit.

Footnote:
3. “New Tallahassee Bureau Expands Our Coverage,” op. cit.

[4] Michele McLellan, “Turning Rivalries into Partnerships,” Knight Digital Media Center, Jan. 13, 2009,www.knightdigitalmediacenter.org/leadership_blog/comments/turning_rivalries_into_partnerships.

Footnote:
4. Michele McLellan, “Turning Rivalries into Partnerships,” Knight Digital Media Center, Jan. 13, 2009,www.knightdigitalmediacenter.org/leadership_blog/comments/turning_rivalries_into_partnerships.

[5] “New Tallahassee Bureau Expands Our Coverage,” op. cit.

Footnote:
5. “New Tallahassee Bureau Expands Our Coverage,” op. cit.

[6] McLellan, op. cit.

Footnote:
6. McLellan, op. cit.


Document Citation
Price, T. (2009, March 27). Future of journalism. CQ Researcher, 19, 273-296. Retrieved from http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/
Document ID: cqresrre2009032700
Document URL: http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre2009032700


Issue Tracker for Related Reports
Journalism, Newspapers, and the Media
May 03, 2013  Media Bias
Apr. 26, 2013  Free Speech at Risk
Apr. 12, 2013  Combat Journalism
Nov. 2010  Press FreedomCQ Global Researcher
Oct. 08, 2010  Journalism Standards in the Internet Age
Feb. 05, 2010  Press Freedom
Mar. 27, 2009  Future of JournalismUpdated
Jun. 09, 2006  Blog ExplosionUpdated
Jan. 20, 2006  Future of Newspapers
Apr. 08, 2005  Free-Press Disputes
Oct. 15, 2004  Media Bias
Oct. 10, 2003  Media OwnershipUpdated
Dec. 25, 1998  Journalism Under Fire
Jun. 05, 1998  Student Journalism
Sep. 20, 1996  Civic Journalism
Sep. 23, 1994  Courts and the Media
Aug. 24, 1990  Hard Times at the Nation's Newspapers
Jan. 19, 1990  Finding Truth in the Age of ‘Infotainment’
Aug. 18, 1989  Libel Law: Finding the Right Balance
Jun. 06, 1986  Magazine Trends
Oct. 12, 1984  News Media and Presidential Campaigns
Jul. 15, 1983  State of American Newspapers
Oct. 23, 1981  High Cost of Libel
Dec. 23, 1977  Media Reforms
Mar. 11, 1977  News Media Ownership
Jun. 21, 1974  Access to the Media
Dec. 20, 1972  Newsmen's Rights
Aug. 16, 1972  Blacks in the News Media
Dec. 15, 1971  Magazine Industry Shake-Out
Jul. 18, 1969  Competing Media
Sep. 02, 1964  Politicians and the Press
Dec. 04, 1963  Libel Suits and Press Freedom
Jan. 09, 1963  Newspaper Mergers
Dec. 20, 1961  Reading Boom: Books and Magazines
Dec. 02, 1959  Privileged Communications
Apr. 25, 1956  Newsprint Deficit
May 06, 1953  Government and the Press
Sep. 21, 1948  Press and State
Sep. 05, 1947  Newsprint Supply
Mar. 26, 1947  Facsimile Newspapers
Dec. 10, 1945  World Press Freedom
May 01, 1940  New Experiments in Newspaper-Making
Nov. 04, 1933  Press Freedom Under the Recovery Program

Browse Related Topics
Journalism and the News