Report Summary January 23, 2009
 Current Issue Cover Photo

Regulating Toxic Chemicals
Do we know enough about chemical risks?
By Jennifer Weeks

Chemicals are integral to many everyday products, from electronics and toys to building materials and household goods. But environmental, health and consumer advocates say the agencies responsible for protecting Americans from exposure to harmful chemicals are allowing too many dangerous substances into the market without testing them for toxicity. Some goods, such as medicines, are tested for safety. . . .

Read the Full Report (Subscription Required)
Buy Report PDF PDF


The Issues


Pro/Con
Does the precautionary principle make us safer?

Pro Pro
Wendy E. Wagner
Professor of Law University of Texas. Written for CQ Researcher, January 2009
Gary Marchant
Professor of Law Arizona State University. Written for CQ Researcher, January 2009


Spotlight
Some cause cancer and other health problems.

Studies indicate that all human beings alive today carry traces of many industrial chemicals in their bodies. Some of these substances enter during fetal development or infanthood, carried by maternal blood and breast milk. In addition, we inhale airborne pollutants, ingest pesticide residues and chemical additives with our food and drinking water and absorb others through our skin. Exposure can happen in the workplace, outdoors or inside homes and schools.

Some so-called "chemical body burdens" in humans are harmless, but others can cause cancer, birth defects, developmental problems and other serious health impacts. Many are still being studied. The presence of a chemical in the body does not necessarily mean it will cause harm, but scientists say chemical exposure is pervasive in modern society, and they underscore the importance of testing widely used chemicals for toxic effects.

"I find it remarkable that in this day and age one of the primary ways by which the toxic effects of chemicals are discovered is still the 'body in the morgue' method," writes epidemiologist and former assistant secretary of Energy David Michaels. "An industrial worker dies from some very unusual condition, and we ask why. Well, some of us ask."

For example, Michaels notes, chemical companies that make diacetyl (the main ingredient in artificial butter flavor) did not know that breathing the compound could cause lung damage until workers in popcorn factories became ill. Manufacturers had been required to test diacetyl as a food ingredient, but not as an airborne contaminant in the workplace. Footnote 1

an inuit woman dries a caribou skin (AFP/Getty Images/Andre Forget)
An Inuit woman in Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada, dries a caribou skin. Toxic chemicals remain a major threat to traditional ways of life in the Arctic. (AFP/Getty Images/Andre Forget)

According to a 2005 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), well over 100 chemicals are present in Americans at detectable levels, including heavy metals like cadmium and mercury, phthalates and many pesticides. Levels of some chemicals have fallen in recent years, notably lead (which has been banned from gasoline and house paint) and substances found in secondhand cigarette smoke. Footnote 2

Others are more worrisome. For example, the CDC found that almost 6 percent of women of childbearing age had blood levels of mercury that were borderline dangerous. Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that can cause birth defects, nervous system damage and other harmful effects. It is emitted into the air from sources including coal-burning power plants and incinerators, then falls back to the surface and concentrates in the food chain. Humans are exposed mainly by eating fish that contain high amounts of mercury.

Another 2005 study commissioned by two advocacy organizations, Commonweal and the Environmental Working Group, tested umbilical cord blood from 10 babies born in U.S. hospitals during the previous year. Researchers found an average of 200 industrial chemicals and pollutants in the samples, including mercury, environmental pollutants known as dioxins and pesticides. This study showed that pollutants cross the placenta from mother to fetus as infants grow in utero, exposing the gestating infants to a complex mixture of chemicals during critical months of development. Footnote 3

Living far from industrial sources does not necessarily make people safer from exposures. Indigenous peoples in the Arctic have some of the highest body concentrations of mercury, PCBs and other pollutants of any region on the planet, thanks to global wind patterns and ocean currents that carry pollutants to the poles. Inuit, Aleut, and other native people in Greenland, Alaska and Canada eat large quantities of locally caught meat and fish, which contain high concentrations of chemicals. Footnote 4

Recent studies show that concentrations of some toxins in Arctic food animals are stabilizing, thanks to international agreements limiting use of some of the most hazardous chemicals. Footnote 5 However, toxic chemicals remain a major threat to Arctic indigenous peoples' traditional way of life — an ironic fate for people who neither produce nor use most of these products.

[1] David Michaels, Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health (Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 247.

Footnote:
1. David Michaels, Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health (Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 247.

[2] "Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals," 2005, www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/report.htm, and "Spotlight on Mercury," both Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, www.cdc.gov/ExposureReport/pdf/factsheet_mercury.pdf.

Footnote:
2. "Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals," 2005, www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/report.htm, and "Spotlight on Mercury," both Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, www.cdc.gov/ExposureReport/pdf/factsheet_mercury.pdf.

[3] "Body Burden — The Pollution in Newborns," Environmental Working Group, July 14, 2005, http://archive.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/contentindex.php.

Footnote:
3. "Body Burden — The Pollution in Newborns," Environmental Working Group, July 14, 2005, http://archive.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/contentindex.php.

[4] Marla Cone, Silent Snow: The Slow Poisoning of the Arctic (2006).

Footnote:
4. Marla Cone, Silent Snow: The Slow Poisoning of the Arctic (2006).

[5] "Toxic Chemical Levels Finally Dropping in Arctic Food Animals, New Study Shows," The Canadian Press news agency, July 14, 2008.

Footnote:
5. "Toxic Chemical Levels Finally Dropping in Arctic Food Animals, New Study Shows," The Canadian Press news agency, July 14, 2008.


Document Citation
Weeks, J. (2009, January 23). Regulating toxic chemicals. CQ Researcher, 19, 49-72. Retrieved from http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/
Document ID: cqresrre2009012300
Document URL: http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre2009012300


Issue Tracker for Related Reports
Consumer Protection
Nov. 11, 2011  Google's Dominance
Jan. 23, 2009  Regulating Toxic Chemicals
Dec. 19, 2008  Limiting Lawsuits
Oct. 12, 2007  Consumer Safety
Feb. 17, 1978  Consumer Protection: Gains and Setbacks
Nov. 15, 1972  Toy Safety
Mar. 03, 1960  Consumer Protection

Browse Related Topics
Consumer Protection and Product Liability
Medical Research and Advocacy
Regulation and Deregulation