Report Summary September 26, 2008
 Current Issue Cover Photo

Gay Marriage Showdowns
Will voters bar marriage for same-sex couples?
By Kenneth Jost

The California Supreme Court gave gay rights advocates a major victory in May, ruling the state's constitution guarantees same-sex couples the same marriage rights as opposite-sex pairs. Thousands of same-sex couples from California and around the country have already taken advantage of the decision to obtain legal recognition from California for their unions. Opponents, however, have placed on the. . . .

Read the Full Report (Subscription Required)
Buy Report PDF PDF


The Issues


Pro/Con
Should the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) be repealed?

Pro Pro
Evan Wolfson
Executive Director, Freedom to Marry; author, Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality, and Gay People's Right to Marry. Written for CQ Researcher, September 2008
Peter Sprigg
Vice president for policy, Family Research Council; author, Outrage: How Gay Activists and Liberal Judges Are Trashing Democracy to Redefine Marriage. Written for CQ Researcher, September 2008


Spotlight
"It really is something out of Orwell," a critic says.

Even though Massachusetts and California recognize same-sex marriages, the U.S. Census Bureau will not count gay or lesbian spouses as married in the 2010 census.

Census Bureau officials say the policy of treating married same-sex couples as unmarried partners is dictated by the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages for any purpose under federal law. The law "requires all federal agencies to recognize only opposite-sex marriages for the purpose of administering federal programs," Census spokesman Stephen Bruckner explained shortly after the policy was disclosed in July. Footnote 1

The policy has drawn criticism from same-sex couples in both states and from gay rights advocacy groups. "To have the federal government disappear your marriage I'm sure will be painful and upsetting," Shannon Minter, legal director for the San Francisco-based National Center for Lesbian Rights, told the San Jose Mercury News, which first disclosed the policy. "It really is something out of [1984 author George] Orwell." Footnote 2

Demographer Gary Gates at the pro-gay marriage Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law, says the decision amounts to deliberately producing inaccurate population data. "Bureau officials should acknowledge the reality that same-sex couples can legally marry in this country," he says, "and stop altering the accurate responses of same-sex couples who describe themselves as married." Footnote 3

Anti-gay marriage groups, however, defend the bureau's decision. "We're dealing with a government entity that is given certain charters and mandates, and they have to subscribe to public law," says Kris Mineau, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute. Footnote 4

The bureau's decision will not affect the overall population count, which the Constitution requires every 10 years in order to apportion seats in the House of Representatives among the 50 states. But detailed information from the household questionnaires is used by the bureau and by independent researchers to provide demographic analyses in such areas as family structure and size, income and education.

The bureau says the questionnaires used in the 2010 census will not be destroyed, so the data will theoretically be available to independent researchers later. But the bureau's decision will slow a count of married same-sex couples in California, where marriage licenses now identify spouses only as "Party A" and "Party B."

[1] Quoted in Eric Moskowitz, "Federal rules mean thousands of same-sex marriages in Massachusetts will be ignored in the U.S. 2010 Census," The Boston Globe, July 27, 2008, p. B1.

Footnote:
1. Quoted in Eric Moskowitz, "Federal rules mean thousands of same-sex marriages in Massachusetts will be ignored in the U.S. 2010 Census," The Boston Globe, July 27, 2008, p. B1.

[2] See Mike Swift, "U.S. Census Bureau won't count same-sex marriages," San Jose Mercury News, July 12, 2008.

Footnote:
2. See Mike Swift, "U.S. Census Bureau won't count same-sex marriages," San Jose Mercury News, July 12, 2008.

[3] See Gary J. Gates, "Making same-sex marriages count," Los Angeles Times, July 18, 2008, p. A25.

Footnote:
3. See Gary J. Gates, "Making same-sex marriages count," Los Angeles Times, July 18, 2008, p. A25.

[4] Quoted in Moskowitz, op. cit.

Footnote:
4. Quoted in Moskowitz, op. cit.


Document Citation
Jost, K. (2008, September 26). Gay marriage showdowns. CQ Researcher, 18, 769-792. Retrieved from http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/
Document ID: cqresrre2008092600
Document URL: http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre2008092600


Issue Tracker for Related Reports
Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered Individuals
Mar. 15, 2013  Gay Marriage
Mar. 01, 2011  Gay RightsCQ Global Researcher
Sep. 18, 2009  Gays in the MilitaryUpdated
Sep. 26, 2008  Gay Marriage ShowdownsUpdated
May 05, 2006  Transgender Issues
Oct. 01, 2004  Gays on Campus
Sep. 05, 2003  Gay Marriage
Apr. 14, 2000  Gay-Rights Update
Mar. 05, 1993  Gay Rights
Sep. 04, 1992  Domestic Partners
Jun. 29, 1984  Gay Politics
Mar. 08, 1974  Homosexual Legal Rights
Jul. 10, 1963  Homosexuality: Morals and Security

Browse Related Topics
Civil Rights: Gays and Lesbians
Marriage and Divorce
Sexuality