Report Summary October 22, 2004
 Current Issue Cover Photo

Cloning Debate
Should all forms of human cloning be banned?
By Brian Hansen

Cloning became a hot issue in this year's presidential race after scientists in South Korea announced that they had created human embryos by cloning, and former first lady Nancy Reagan urged President Bush to reconsider his policies on so-called therapeutic cloning and embryonic stem-cell research. Some scientists think embryonic stem-cell research could someday produce cures for Parkinson's disease,. . . .

Read the Full Report (Subscription Required)
Buy Report PDF PDF


Pro/Con
Should Congress ban all forms of human cloning?

Pro Pro
David Prentice
Senior Fellow for Life Sciences, Family Research Council. Written for The CQ Researcher, October 2004
Daniel Perry
President, Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research. Written for The CQ Researcher, October 2004


Spotlight

So far, no one has presented any hard scientific evidence, such as a DNA test, to prove that a human clone has been born. But some claim that — like something out of a science fiction movie — clones already walk among us.

Brigitte Boisselier, a member of the Raelian religious sect (who believe humans are descendants of clones created 25,000 years ago by space aliens) and Italian gynecologist Severino Antinori both say they have facilitated the births of more than a dozen human clones. And Kentucky-based fertility specialist Panayiotis Zavos says he has implanted a cloned embryo in a woman, but that she failed to become pregnant. He plans to implant other women soon, he says.

Boisselier, Zavos and Antinori say they have good reasons for not providing proof of their purported cloning accomplishments: Doing so would violate their clients' privacy and could even subject them to violence by anti-cloning zealots.

The three say they also fear arrest. Reproductive cloning is illegal in France and Italy, Boisselier's and Antinori's native countries, respectively. Even if Boisselier offered proof while in a country where reproductive cloning is still legal (such as the United States), Boisselier could be extradited back to her native France to stand trial.

“Why should I give the world the proof that will put me in jail?” asks Boisselier, who says she's currently negotiating with several foreign governments to allow her to take up residence without fear of extradition. “I will not give the proof unless there is a place I can stay, and I am very confident that no extradition can happen.” If those conditions were met, she continues, “Then, of course, I will give every detail.”

Here are the three scientists' claims:

  • Boisselier runs Clonaid, the Raelians' human cloning project. On Dec. 27, 2002, She announced that Clonaid had facilitated the birth of the world's first human clone. She said the baby, nicknamed Eve, was born the previous day to a 31-year-old American woman at an undisclosed overseas location. Boisselier promised to provide proof of the claim but never did, claiming that Eve's parents refused to allow any genetic testing. Boisselier says Eve is currently living in Israel, and that Clonaid has since facilitated the births of more than a dozen other clones.

  • Antinori became known in the 1990s for his controversial work in helping post-menopausal women have children. In 2001, he announced his intention to facilitate the birth of a human clone. In 2002 and 2003 he made several inconsistent claims that clonal pregnancies were under way. In May 2004, he said at least three babies had been born, but that he had played only an “advisory” role in their births. Although Antinori's medical and research credentials make his claims at least somewhat plausible, there is no evidence to support his announcements.

  • Zavos runs fertility clinics in Lexington, Ky., London and Limassol, Cyprus. In May 2002, Zavos said he had assembled a team of scientists and had approved 12 couples for participation in cloning experiments. In April 2003, he published a picture said to be of a four-day-old cloned embryo, but the peer-reviewed analysis he promised did not follow. In January 2004, he announced that he had implanted a cloned embryo in one of his clients, but two weeks later said the woman had failed to become pregnant.


Document Citation
Hansen, B. (2004, October 22). Cloning debate. CQ Researcher, 14, 877-900. Retrieved from http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/
Document ID: cqresrre2004102200
Document URL: http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre2004102200


Issue Tracker for Related Reports
Genetics and Cloning
Jan. 21, 2011  Genes and Health
May 15, 2009  Reproductive Ethics
Oct. 22, 2004  Cloning Debate
May 18, 2001  Designer Humans
May 12, 2000  Human Genome Research
Dec. 17, 1999  Embryo Research
May 28, 1999  DNA Databases
Apr. 03, 1998  Biology and Behavior
May 09, 1997  The Cloning Controversy
Dec. 08, 1995  Gene Therapy's Future
Apr. 08, 1994  Reproductive Ethics
Oct. 18, 1991  Gene Therapy
Aug. 16, 1991  Fetal Tissue Research
Jun. 30, 1989  Solving Crimes with Genetic Fingerprinting
Apr. 03, 1987  Biotechnology Developments
Jan. 10, 1986  Genetic Breakthroughs
Dec. 26, 1980  Genetic Business
Mar. 25, 1977  Genetic Research
May 19, 1971  Human Engineering
Aug. 20, 1969  Human Intelligence
Dec. 13, 1967  Genetics and the Life Process

Browse Related Topics
Biology and Life Sciences
Genetic Disorders and Medical Genetics
Medical Devices and Technology
Religion and Politics