Report Summary October 25, 2002
 Current Issue Cover Photo

Bush and the Environment
Are the president's policies helping or hurting?
By Mary H. Cooper

Since taking office two years ago, President Bush has sought to reverse an array of regulations and longstanding environmental-protection laws. Administration officials say many of the old rules actually were harming the environment and the economy — such as by permitting delays in removing flammable deadwood from forests or by barring oil and gas production on public land. Bush also repudiated. . . .

Read the Full Report (Subscription Required)
Buy Report PDF PDF


Pro/Con
Should the government relax emissions rules on older power plants?

Pro Pro
Jeffrey Holmstead
Assistant Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency . From testimony before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Subcommittee on Public Health, Sept. 3, 2002
Carol M. Browner
Former Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency (1993-2001). From testimony before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Subcommittee on Public Health, Sept. 3, 2002


Spotlight

President Bush has filled several key policy positions with people who have strong ties to industries opposed to environmental-protection laws. Some of the appointees even advocated the repeal or weakening of the very laws they were hired to enforce.

Bush himself is a former executive with Harken Energy Corp., a Texas oil-drilling firm. He chose fellow oilman Dick Cheney, then CEO of the oil-services firm Halliburton Corp., as his running mate in his successful bid for the White House in 2000. He then picked many of his administration's other top officials from the energy, mining and timber industries, all of which have chafed under regulations designed to curb pollution.

Topping the list of appointees hostile to existing environmental-protection programs is Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham, a former U.S. senator from Michigan who in 1999 actually proposed abolishing the department he was picked to head barely two years later. Abraham — whose home state is the center of the U.S. automobile industry — also voted against stronger fuel-efficiency standards for cars and trucks and for cuts to federal funding aimed at spurring the development of less-polluting renewable-energy sources.

Abraham helped craft the administration's national energy policy, presented last year, which calls for increased domestic production of fossil fuels — oil, coal and natural gas — which when burned produce gases and other air pollutants thought to contribute to global warming. The plan also calls for opening more public land, including 2,000 acres of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), to drilling and mining operations. The energy plan is currently under consideration in the Senate, where Democrats have refused to go along with drilling in ANWR. Abraham's lifetime environmental voting record earned a low 5 percent rating this year from the League of Conservation Voters. Footnote 1

Meanwhile, oil and gas exploration and production is proceeding apace on other federal lands, especially in the Intermountain West, thanks to rulemaking changes backed by Interior Secretary Gale Norton. Norton came from the Denver-based Mountain States Legal Foundation, a conservative property-rights advocacy group headed by James Watt, President Ronald Reagan's controversial Interior secretary (1981-83). The foundation supports opening public lands to logging and mining and recently announced plans to file a suit to block the proposed new listing of a rare mouse under the Endangered Species Act, a law Norton is responsible for implementing. Footnote 2

As Colorado's attorney general, Norton cut her agency's budget for enforcing environmental laws by a third. Since taking office, she has overseen a massive expansion of drilling for oil, gas and coal-bed methane in the Rockies, including on some national monuments. She withdrew a report from the Interior Department's Fish and Wildlife Service that was critical of mountaintop removal. The controversial coal-mining technique pollutes downstream water in much of Appalachia. Norton later delayed completion of a study on the technique's environmental impact. Footnote 3

The records of other key Bush officials are less blatantly anti-environmental. Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman, whose domain includes the Forest Service and such environmental issues as pesticide regulations and genetically modified food, worked for a law firm that fought President Clinton's proposed moratorium on road building in national forests. But she has won praise from environmentalists for supporting farm-conservation programs, though to little avail. This year's farm bill actually cut some of those programs. Footnote 4 And Fran Mainella, director of the National Park Service, another Interior Department agency, won conservationists' praise for her management of Florida's state park system. Yet she also went along with Norton in reversing a Clinton ban on recreational snowmobiling in Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks last summer. Footnote 5

The Bush administration official with the most visible role in environmental policy enforcement is Christine Todd Whitman, head of the independent Environmental Protection Agency. As governor of New Jersey, Whitman had a mixed record on environmental issues. A strong supporter of so-called smart growth, she set up a program to save open space and discourage suburban sprawl. But she also loosened rules requiring industries to report their use and release of toxic chemicals. Since becoming EPA administrator, Whitman has continued to garner mixed reviews from environmentalists, who welcome some of her decisions, including one forcing General Electric to clean up its deposits of deadly dioxin from the Hudson River. But she is faulted for defending the Bush administration's loosening of rules requiring older power plants to install modern anti-pollution equipment. Footnote 6

Conservationists have been critical of Interior Secretary Gale A. Norton, left, and EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman. (CQ/Scott Ferrell (both)
Conservationists have been critical of Interior Secretary Gale A. Norton, left, and EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman. (CQ/Scott Ferrell (both)

It is at lower echelons of government that less visible political appointees with industry ties are making some of the most sweeping changes to environmental policies through the rulemaking process. Agriculture Undersecretary Mark Rey, for example, was a longtime timber-company lobbyist before becoming the administration's top forestry official. Rey helped shape the president's Healthy Forests Initiative, which would let his former clients harvest more large, commercially valuable trees in national forests in exchange for agreeing to clear them of fire-prone undergrowth. Only about half the changes called for under the plan require congressional approval.

Deputy Interior Secretary J. Steven Griles was a mining and energy industry lobbyist before joining the department that oversees both industries' access to public lands. He has come under scrutiny for potential conflict of interest stemming from his alleged interest in firms that stand to benefit from such department decisions as the issuance of permits for mining and mountaintop removal. Footnote 7

[1] League of Conservation Voters, “Presidential Report Card,” January 2002. Information in this section is based on this report unless otherwise noted.

Footnote:
1. League of Conservation Voters, “Presidential Report Card,” January 2002. Information in this section is based on this report unless otherwise noted.

[2] “Group Threatens Lawsuit to Keep Mouse Off Endangered List,” Associated Press Newswires, Aug. 1, 2002.

Footnote:
2. “Group Threatens Lawsuit to Keep Mouse Off Endangered List,” Associated Press Newswires, Aug. 1, 2002.

[3] See John Raby, “Mining Study Not Expected Until February,” Associated Press Newswires, Aug. 2, 2002.

Footnote:
3. See John Raby, “Mining Study Not Expected Until February,” Associated Press Newswires, Aug. 2, 2002.

[4] See Jake Thompson, “Farm-State Lawmakers Rip USDA Officials,” Omaha World-Herald, Sept. 24, 2002.

Footnote:
4. See Jake Thompson, “Farm-State Lawmakers Rip USDA Officials,” Omaha World-Herald, Sept. 24, 2002.

[5] See Michael Kilian, “Park Service Tweaks Snowmobile Policy; New Guidelines to Avert Total Ban,” Chicago Tribune, June 27, 2002.

Footnote:
5. See Michael Kilian, “Park Service Tweaks Snowmobile Policy; New Guidelines to Avert Total Ban,” Chicago Tribune, June 27, 2002.

[6] See H. Josef Hebert, “Bid to Ease Pollution Standards Under Fire,” Houston Chronicle, Sept. 4, 2002.

Footnote:
6. See H. Josef Hebert, “Bid to Ease Pollution Standards Under Fire,” Houston Chronicle, Sept. 4, 2002.

[7] See Eric Pianin, “Official's Lobbying Ties Decried,” The Washington Post, April 25, 2002; and “Boxer Seeks Conflict Probe in Mine Ruling,” Los Angeles Times, Oct. 5, 2002.

Footnote:
7. See Eric Pianin, “Official's Lobbying Ties Decried,” The Washington Post, April 25, 2002; and “Boxer Seeks Conflict Probe in Mine Ruling,” Los Angeles Times, Oct. 5, 2002.


Document Citation
Cooper, M. H. (2002, October 25). Bush and the environment. CQ Researcher, 12, 865-896. Retrieved from http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/
Document ID: cqresrre2002102500
Document URL: http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre2002102500


Issue Tracker for Related Reports
Environmental Protection
Nov. 06, 2012  Vanishing BiodiversityCQ Global Researcher
Nov. 02, 2012  Managing Wildfires
Nov. 04, 2011  Managing Public Lands
Aug. 26, 2011  Gulf Coast Restoration
Jul. 2010  Plastic PollutionCQ Global Researcher
Feb. 2010  Climate ChangeCQ Global Researcher
Jan. 09, 2009  Confronting Warming
Dec. 05, 2008  Reducing Your Carbon Footprint
Nov. 2008  Carbon TradingCQ Global Researcher
Oct. 03, 2008  Protecting Wetlands
Feb. 29, 2008  Buying Green
Dec. 14, 2007  Future of Recycling
Nov. 30, 2007  Disappearing Species
Feb. 2007  Curbing Climate ChangeCQ Global Researcher
Dec. 01, 2006  The New Environmentalism
Jan. 27, 2006  Climate Change
Oct. 25, 2002  Bush and the Environment
Oct. 05, 2001  Invasive Species
Nov. 05, 1999  Saving Open Spaces
Jun. 11, 1999  Saving the Rain Forests
May 21, 1999  Setting Environmental Priorities
Mar. 19, 1999  Partisan Politics
Oct. 16, 1998  National Forests
Jun. 19, 1998  Environmental Justice
Aug. 23, 1996  Cleaning Up Hazardous Wastes
Mar. 31, 1995  Environmental Movement at 25
Jun. 19, 1992  Lead Poisoning
May 15, 1992  Jobs Vs. Environment
Jan. 17, 1992  Oil Spills
Sep. 20, 1991  Saving the Forests
Apr. 26, 1991  Electromagnetic Fields: Are They Dangerous?
Sep. 08, 1989  Free Market Environmental Protection
Dec. 09, 1988  Setting Environmental Priorities
Jul. 29, 1988  Living with Hazardous Wastes
Dec. 20, 1985  Requiem for Rain Forests?
Aug. 17, 1984  Protecting the Wilderness
Jun. 15, 1984  Troubled Ocean Fisheries
Aug. 19, 1983  America's Disappearing Wetlands
Feb. 22, 1980  Noise Control
Nov. 16, 1979  Closing the Environmental Decade
Oct. 13, 1978  Toxic Substance Control
Feb. 27, 1976  Pollution Control: Costs and Benefits
Nov. 28, 1975  Forest Policy
May 30, 1975  Wilderness Preservation
Dec. 20, 1974  Environmental Policy
Nov. 14, 1973  Strip Mining
Dec. 01, 1971  Global Pollution
Jul. 21, 1971  Protection of the Countryside
Jan. 06, 1971  Pollution Technology
Jun. 19, 1968  Protection of the Environment
Oct. 30, 1963  Noise Suppression

Browse Related Topics
Energy and the Environment
International Law and Agreements