Privacy in the Workplace

November 19, 1993 • Volume 3, Issue 43
Does electronic monitoring violate workers' privacy?
By Richard L. Worsnop

Introduction

Many offices have electronic eyes and ears that record what employees do and say. Most workers condemn the practice as a privacy violation and mark of management distrust. They also blame monitoring for causing various physical and emotional ills. Employers, on the other hand, say monitoring is a legitimate management tool that helps them maintain a safe and productive workplace. Some recent labor contracts lay down monitoring ground rules. However, legislation now before Congress would go further, sharply restricting electronic surveillance of employees without prior notice. Meanwhile, many workers remain subject to other types of workplace monitoring, including testing for AIDS, drug use and honesty. And future technological advances may bring still more monitoring.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Privacy
Dec. 04, 2015  Privacy and the Internet
Oct. 25, 2013  Big Data and Privacy
Aug. 30, 2013  Government Surveillance
Jan. 25, 2013  Social Media Explosion
Sep. 17, 2010  Social Networking
Nov. 06, 2009  Online Privacy Updated
Nov. 17, 2006  Privacy in Peril
Jun. 15, 2001  Privacy Under Attack
Nov. 06, 1998  Internet Privacy
Nov. 19, 1993  Privacy in the Workplace
Apr. 17, 1992  Politicians and Privacy
Jan. 20, 1989  Your Right to Privacy
Mar. 21, 1986  Privacy in the Workplace
Oct. 18, 1974  Rights to Privacy
Apr. 05, 1967  Wiretapping and Bugging
Apr. 20, 1966  Protection of Privacy
Nov. 09, 1961  Wiretapping in Law Enforcement
Feb. 29, 1956  Surveillance of Spying
Jan. 25, 1956  Eavesdropping Controls
Mar. 14, 1949  Wire Tapping
BROWSE RELATED TOPICS:
Drug Abuse
Labor Standards and Practices
Privacy