U.S. Trade Policy

January 29, 1993 • Volume 3, Issue 4
Will Clinton get tough with America's trading partners?
By Patrick G. Marshall

Introduction

As the Clinton administration takes the reins of power in Washington, the United States is still suffering from a sluggish economy and a resurgent $85 billion annual trade deficit. A large portion of that deficit, some experts say, results from the unfair trade practices of other countries, including Japan and West Germany. If the rhetoric of the presidential campaign is any guide, President Clinton's appointees will be more aggressive in negotiations with U.S. trading partners than the Bush administration was. But some analysts warn that the real problems with the U.S. trade deficit can be found right at home -- in the vast federal deficit and in the absence of a strong industrial policy -- and that pointing the finger at other countries won't solve the problems.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
United States and Foreign Trade
Sep. 13, 2013  U.S. Trade Policy
Jun. 07, 1996  Rethinking NAFTA
Jan. 29, 1993  U.S. Trade Policy
Dec. 08, 1989  North America Trade Pact: a Good Idea?
Sep. 05, 1986  Trade Trouble-Shooting
Mar. 04, 1983  Global Recession and U.S. Trade
Jan. 12, 1979  Trade Talks and Protectionism
Dec. 16, 1977  Job Protection and Free Trade
May 14, 1976  International Trade Negotiations
Dec. 06, 1961  Revision of Trade and Tariff Policy
Mar. 21, 1960  European Trade Blocs and American Exports
Jan. 30, 1958  Foreign Trade Policy
Jul. 28, 1954  Foreign Trade and the National Interest
Jan. 25, 1940  Tariff Reciprocity and Trade Agreements
Jun. 11, 1935  Foreign Trade Policy of the United States
Jan. 25, 1934  Foreign Trade and Currency Stability
Nov. 01, 1930  Foreign Trade of the United States
Sep. 27, 1923  Combining for the Import Trade
BROWSE RELATED TOPICS:
Bilateral and Regional Trade