Report Outline
Vietnam GI as New Breed of Veteran
Sources of Readjustment Problems
Programs to Aid Return to Civilian Life
Special Focus
Vietnam GI as New Breed of Veteran
Emerging of ‘Vietvet’ fromm Year of Obscurity
With the cease-fire in Vietnam and the return of American prisoners of war, attention is focusing more and more on the new veteran and how he is adjusting to civilian life. Every war produces this kind of public concern, compounded partly of a sense of obligation to the warrior and partly of a fear that he will return brutalized or resentful or in some other condition that will threaten the peace and comfort of civilian society. Adding to concern today is a strong sense that this war is different from the others, the veteran is different, and his readjustment problems may be more complex than those of his predecessors after earlier wars. “There is something special about Vietnam veterans,” writes Robert Jay Lifton, the Yale psychiatrist. “Everyone who has contact with them seems to agree that they are different from veterans of other wars.”
Much has been learned from other wars of the 20th century about the psychology of the citizen-soldier, but what has been gleaned from the past may not be sufficient to explain the state of mind of many young men who served in Vietnam. “To do the job that must be done [to provide veterans with maximum assistance in readjusting to civilian life] it is important that the characteristics, needs and problems of the Vietnam veteran be thoroughly understood by all who might relate to him,” officials of the Veterans Administration's Department of Medicine and Surgery have said. “Especially it is important that he be seen in the perspective of the war in which he has fought and of the society to which he belongs.”
Until recently the Vietnam veteran could have been described as the forgotten man. In few wars had returning soldiers slipped back so unobtrusively into civilian life, with so little showing of uniforms or flashing of medals. The veteran's in visibility was particularly remarkable in view of his numbers. More than six million veterans served in the armed forces during the “Vietnam era,” which officially dates from Aug. 5, 1964. Approximately 2.4 million of them served in Southeast Asia. Because the draftee's term of service is two years, and tours of duty in Vietnam were normally one year, GIs have been returning to civilian life after war service for at least six years. For most of those years, their presence as a special segment of the population was scarcely felt in the nation at large. |
|
|
 |
Feb. 18, 2000 |
Legacy of the Vietnam War |
 |
Dec. 03, 1993 |
U.S.-Vietnam Relations |
 |
Mar. 18, 1988 |
Vietnam: Unified, Independent and Poor |
 |
Jul. 06, 1984 |
Agent Orange: The Continuing Debate |
 |
Nov. 04, 1983 |
MIAs: Decade of Frustration |
 |
Mar. 11, 1983 |
Vietnam War Reconsidered |
 |
Oct. 21, 1977 |
Vietnam Veterans: Continuing Readjustment |
 |
Jan. 18, 1974 |
Vietnam Aftermath |
 |
Feb. 21, 1973 |
Vietnam Veterans |
 |
Jun. 09, 1971 |
Prospects for Democracy in South Vietnam |
 |
May 06, 1970 |
Cambodia and Laos: the Widening War |
 |
Jan. 07, 1970 |
War Atrocities and the Law |
 |
Jul. 02, 1969 |
Resolution of Conflicts |
 |
Apr. 17, 1968 |
Reconstruction in South Vietnam |
 |
Aug. 23, 1967 |
Political Evolution in South Viet Nam |
 |
Jan. 11, 1967 |
Rural Pacification in South Viet Nam |
 |
May 26, 1965 |
Political Instability in South Viet Nam |
 |
Mar. 25, 1964 |
Neutralization in Southeast Asia |
 |
Apr. 17, 1963 |
Task in South Viet Nam |
 |
Jun. 14, 1961 |
Guerrilla Warfare |
 |
May 17, 1961 |
Threatened Viet Nam |
 |
Sep. 23, 1959 |
Menaced Laos |
| | |
|