Auto Insurance Reform

January 13, 1971

Report Outline
Criticism of Automobiles Insurance System
Liability as Basis of Automobile Insurance
Pros and Cons of No-Fault Coverage Plans
Special Focus

Criticism of Automobiles Insurance System

Every year the automobile sets a number of records in the United States. The average price of a new car creeps steadily upward, as does the total number of cars on the road. Concurrently, new highs are reached in the number of motor vehicle injuries and fatalities, the cost of repairs, and the number of auto thefts. As a result of these and other factors, the cost of automobile insurance has been climbing also. Auto insurance premiums have become almost prohibitively expensive in many urban areas; more disturbing, insurance at any cost sometimes is difficult to obtain.

No one is satisfied with the way automobile insurance is handled today. Car owners complain not only about exorbitant premiums but also about cancellations or refusals to renew policies; state and federal governmental agencies question the underwriting and accounting practices of insurance companies; and the companies plead that they lose money on auto insurance.

There is widespread agreement that a new approach to automobile insurance is needed, but no consensus on what approach is best. Massachusetts, under a law that became effective Jan. 1, 1971, requires all motorists to carry “no-fault” insurance. Such coverage enables a Massachusetts driver to collect up to $2,000 in personal injury claims from his own insurer without litigation and regardless of who was responsible for the accident. In all other states, the concept of tort liability still applies. That is, the question of who was at fault in an accident must be settled before the innocent party can collect damages from the guilty party's insurance company. This fault-finding process, critics contend, is largely responsible for congestion of civil court dockets in numerous cities.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Automobiles
Feb. 17, 2017  Reducing Traffic Deaths
Jul. 25, 2014  Future of Cars
Feb. 06, 2009  Auto Industry's Future Updated
May 16, 2003  SUV Debate
Oct. 26, 2001  Auto Safety
Jan. 21, 2000  Auto Industry's Future
Jul. 25, 1997  Aggressive Driving
Oct. 16, 1992  U.S. Auto Industry
Apr. 27, 1990  Curbing Auto-Insurance Premiums
Jul. 14, 1989  Automakers Face Trouble Down the Road
Aug. 31, 1984  U.S. Auto Industry: Strategies for Survival
Feb. 23, 1979  Auto Research and Regulation
Apr. 28, 1978  Automotive Safety
May 10, 1974  Auto Industry in Flux
Apr. 18, 1973  Auto Emission Controls
Jan. 13, 1971  Auto Insurance Reform
Jul. 27, 1966  Fortunes of Auto Industry
Jun. 04, 1965  Automobile Safety
Jul. 10, 1964  Automobile Insurance and Traffic Safety
Nov. 19, 1958  Small Cars
Apr. 17, 1957  Better Driving
Jul. 01, 1954  Competition in Automobiles
Mar. 23, 1954  Automobile Liability Insurance
Dec. 24, 1952  Highway Accidents: Causes and Remedies
Aug. 21, 1945  Automobiles in the Postwar Economy
Sep. 02, 1938  The Market for Automobiles
Oct. 26, 1932  Outlook for the Automobile Industry
Dec. 10, 1929  Condition of the Automobile Industry
Jan. 30, 1928  Automobile Fatalities and Compulsory Insurance
Dec. 10, 1927  The Status of the Automobile Trade
BROWSE RELATED TOPICS:
Insurance Industry
Motor Traffic Safety