Southern Democrats and the 1952 Election

September 5, 1951

Report Outline
North-South Schism in Democratic Party
Moves to Promote a Party Realignment
Southern Demands on Democratic Party

North-South Schism in Democratic Party

Truman, Eisenhower, and Invasion of Solid South

If Truman and Eisenhower become rival contenders for the presidency next year, there is a strong chance that the Republican party will repeat its feat of 24 years earlier and split the Democratic Solid South. Republican capture of the electoral votes of four southern states in 1928 resulted not so much from the drawing power of Herbert Hoover as from the South's adverse reaction to the candidacy of Alfred E. Smith. With a Truman-Eisenhower lineup in 1952, positive as well as negative forces would be operating to produce a split—on the one hand the popular appeal of Gen. Eisenhower; on the other hand southern opposition to the President's Fair Deal program in general and to his civil rights proposals in particular.

Although the same combination of factors will not be present if other men head the major party tickets, any Republican nominee may profit from the adverse factors if Truman runs again. The South's attitude toward the White House has been conspicuously demonstrated by the frequency with which southern members of Congress have voted with the Republicans in opposition to the administration. The southern Democratic-Republican coalition has been more powerful in the 82nd Congress than at any time since it began to take shape about 15 years ago; in fact, it is now the effective majority in the national legislature.

As a result, there have been suggestions from Republican sources that the coalition be formalized through a political realignment calculated by its proponents to bring about a Republican victory in 1952. Southern Democrats themselves have shown little enthusiasm for that proposal, but some of their leading spokesmen have left no doubt of their determination to fight in next year's convention to win recognition of southern views and curb the influence of the forces that have been dominant in the Democratic party for the last 20 years.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Political Parties
Oct. 13, 2017  Future of the Democratic Party
Sep. 09, 2016  Populism and Party Politics
Nov. 14, 2014  Nonprofit Groups and Partisan Politics
Oct. 24, 2014  Future of the GOP
Feb. 28, 2014  Polarization in America
Mar. 19, 2010  Tea Party Movement Updated
Mar. 20, 2009  Future of the GOP
Jun. 08, 2007  Democrats in Congress
Apr. 30, 2004  The Partisan Divide
Dec. 22, 1995  Third-Party Prospects
Jan. 11, 1985  Post-1984 Political Landscape
Nov. 09, 1984  Democratic Revival in South America
Sep. 14, 1984  Election 1984
Dec. 19, 1980  Future of the Democratic Party
Sep. 29, 1978  New Right in American Politics
Jan. 04, 1974  Future of Conservatism
May 03, 1972  The New Populism
Feb. 02, 1956  Foreign Policy in Political Campaigns
Dec. 22, 1954  Divided Government
Aug. 04, 1952  Two-Party System
Jun. 06, 1952  Party Platforms
Sep. 05, 1951  Southern Democrats and the 1952 Election
Oct. 06, 1948  Voting in 1948
Aug. 27, 1948  Republicans and Foreign Policy
Jul. 16, 1947  Third Party Movements
Aug. 22, 1940  Political Realignments
Jan. 13, 1938  The G. O. P. and the Solid South
Jul. 22, 1936  Third Party Movements in American Politics
Jul. 07, 1936  The Monopoly Issue in Party Politics
Nov. 12, 1935  Party Platforms and the 1936 Campaign
May 18, 1934  Political Trends and New Party Movements
Jan. 13, 1932  National Party Platforms, 1832–1932
May 16, 1928  Third Party Movements
Jan. 21, 1928  Major Party Platforms 1924–1928
Nov. 14, 1924  The Election and the Third Party
Sep. 05, 1924  Party Claims and Past Political Complexion of the States
Jun. 25, 1924  Third Party Platforms
Jun. 18, 1924  Thrid Parties: Past and Prospective
BROWSE RELATED TOPICS:
Campaigns and Elections
Campaigns and Elections
Civil Rights: African Americans
Congress Actions