Political Trends and New Party Movements

May 18, 1934

Report Outline
Indications of Impending Political Realignment
The Administration and Liberal Party Movements
Political Revolt in the Middle and Far West
Plans for New Center and Radical Parties
Cooperative Commonwealth Federation of Canada

Indications of Impending Political Realignment

Afar-Reaching party realignment in the United States is seen in some quarters as the eventual outcome of present political trends and of the anticipated creation of a new party by the progressive Republicans of Wisconsin at the convention which they are to hold on May 19. The basis for establishment of a sectional progressive party in the Northwest is believed to exist in the friendly relations obtaining between the Wisconsin progressives, the Farmer-Labor party of Minnesota, and the Non-Partisan League of North Dakota. According to some observers, there is the further possibility that such a sectional organization might be expanded in 1936 into a national farmer-labor party, along the lines of the 1924 La Follette movement, by the addition of the Socialist party, some of the labor unions, and other radical and liberal groups.

Meanwhile, the division between conservatives and liberals within the two major political parties, long recognized as more real than the division between the parties themselves, has taken on special significance with the initiation of President Roosevelt's recovery program. Pursuit of a distinctly liberal course by the administration has accentuated the old internal party differences and tended to make the Democratic party a haven for all liberals and a less congenial abiding place for Democrats of conservative tendencies. The result is that the major parties are in a state of flux, with indications that a general political realignment may be developing with division on the recovery program as a starting point. Rise of the suggested third party, subscribing to more advanced political views, would supplement this basic liberal and conservative grouping.

Internal Differences in the Two Major Parties

Democratic members of Congress are forced by political considerations to support the administration program, though many of them are known to have little sympathy for its most important features. With the President still enjoying vast popular support, with elections coming in the fall, and with patronage particularly important because of the widespread unemployment, even the most conservative Democrats find it advisable to support administration measures. They all realize that, whether they like it or not, their own political fortunes are inextricably bound up with those of the President, which in turn depend largely on the success or failure of the recovery program.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Political Parties
Oct. 13, 2017  Future of the Democratic Party
Sep. 09, 2016  Populism and Party Politics
Nov. 14, 2014  Nonprofit Groups and Partisan Politics
Oct. 24, 2014  Future of the GOP
Feb. 28, 2014  Polarization in America
Mar. 19, 2010  Tea Party Movement Updated
Mar. 20, 2009  Future of the GOP
Jun. 08, 2007  Democrats in Congress
Apr. 30, 2004  The Partisan Divide
Dec. 22, 1995  Third-Party Prospects
Jan. 11, 1985  Post-1984 Political Landscape
Nov. 09, 1984  Democratic Revival in South America
Sep. 14, 1984  Election 1984
Dec. 19, 1980  Future of the Democratic Party
Sep. 29, 1978  New Right in American Politics
Jan. 04, 1974  Future of Conservatism
May 03, 1972  The New Populism
Feb. 02, 1956  Foreign Policy in Political Campaigns
Dec. 22, 1954  Divided Government
Aug. 04, 1952  Two-Party System
Jun. 06, 1952  Party Platforms
Sep. 05, 1951  Southern Democrats and the 1952 Election
Oct. 06, 1948  Voting in 1948
Aug. 27, 1948  Republicans and Foreign Policy
Jul. 16, 1947  Third Party Movements
Aug. 22, 1940  Political Realignments
Jan. 13, 1938  The G. O. P. and the Solid South
Jul. 22, 1936  Third Party Movements in American Politics
Jul. 07, 1936  The Monopoly Issue in Party Politics
Nov. 12, 1935  Party Platforms and the 1936 Campaign
May 18, 1934  Political Trends and New Party Movements
Jan. 13, 1932  National Party Platforms, 1832–1932
May 16, 1928  Third Party Movements
Jan. 21, 1928  Major Party Platforms 1924–1928
Nov. 14, 1924  The Election and the Third Party
Sep. 05, 1924  Party Claims and Past Political Complexion of the States
Jun. 25, 1924  Third Party Platforms
Jun. 18, 1924  Thrid Parties: Past and Prospective