FEEDBACK

The Glass Banking Bill

April 9, 1932

Report Outline
Scope and Purposes of Glass Bank Reform Bill
Use of Bank Funds in Stock Speculation
Security Company Affiliates: Group Banking
Limitations on Real Estate Loans
Changes in Member Bank Reserve Requirements
Power and Independence of Federal Reserve Board

Scope and Purposes of Glass Bank Reform Bill

Two Emergency Acts dealing with banking and credit have been passed by Congress during the current session: the Reconstruction Finance Corporation Act and the Glass-Steagall Act. These measures were designed to alleviate the credit strain inherent in the existing depression and to avert more bank failures; the first through extension of temporary government loans to financial institutions, railroads, and farmers; the second through temporary relaxation of limitations upon loans to member banks by Federal reserve banks and the admission of United States government bonds as security for the issue of Federal reserve notes. A third bill dealing with banking and credit, the Glass bill, is now under consideration by the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency.

In contrast to the earlier legislation, the Glass bill proposes permanent banking reforms—on the basis of experience during the preceding boom as well as the present depression. Its final section, providing for a more rapid liquidation of closed banks, through the creation of a “Federal Liquidating Corporation,” has been discussed in an earlier report. The bulk of the bill, from which the liquidating provisions are quite distinct, deals with prevention rather than alleviation of financial ills and applies to conditions which may arise in the future rather than to those that now exist.

In the opinion of some of the witnesses who have testified on the bill before the Senate Banking and Currency Committee, the present is an inauspicious time for such legislation, directed as it is against the recurrence of boom conditions, for it is contended that it would delay recovery from the present depression. Senator Glass (D., Va.) has taken the position, however, that only during such a period, when the bad effects of the preceding speculative movement are being experienced, can reforms be brought about.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Banking
Sep. 26, 2014  Digital Currency
Oct. 05, 2012  Euro Crisis
Jan. 20, 2012  Financial Misconduct
Jan. 13, 2012  ‘Occupy’ Movement
Oct. 24, 2008  Financial BailoutUpdated
Sep. 01, 2000  The Federal Reserve
Jun. 22, 1990  S&L Bailout: Assessing the Impact
Nov. 04, 1988  Behind the S&L Crisis
Apr. 26, 1985  New Era in Banking
Nov. 18, 1983  Bankruptcy's Thriving Business
Aug. 07, 1981  Banking Deregulation
Jul. 19, 1974  Banking Stability
Jul. 17, 1968  Banking Innovations
May 06, 1964  Monetary Policy in Prosperity
May 16, 1940  Revision of the Securities Acts
Feb. 27, 1937  Expansion of Branch Banking
Sep. 03, 1935  The Decline of Commercial Banking
Dec. 11, 1934  Proposals for a Government-Owned Central Bank
Sep. 12, 1934  Bank Reserves and Credit Inflation
Nov. 27, 1933  Bank Credit in Depression and Recovery
Aug. 12, 1933  Closed Banks and Banking Reform
Apr. 04, 1933  Unified Control of Banking
Apr. 09, 1932  The Glass Banking Bill
Mar. 24, 1932  The Guaranty of Bank Deposits
Apr. 17, 1930  The International Bank and the Gold Standard
Feb. 08, 1930  Branch Banking and Chain Banking
Apr. 29, 1929  Mergers of Banking Institutions
Oct. 28, 1927  The Federal Reserve Rate Controversy
May 21, 1927  Labor Banking and Finance Since 1920
Jan. 31, 1924  The Northwestern Bank Failures and the Attack on Treasury Savings Certificates
Dec. 01, 1923  Why State Banks Do Not Join the Federal Reserve System, the Effect on the System and the Issues Involved
Nov. 23, 1923  Branch Bank Controversy
BROWSE RELATED TOPICS:
Economic Crises
Financial Institutions
FEEDBACK

Your Email Address

Subject

Provide Feedback

Suggest a topic here.

Type the characters you see below into the box

Take our survey to help us improve CQ Researcher!