FEEDBACK

Decisions of the Supreme Court, 1929–30

June 9, 1930

Report Outline
Changes in Court Membership: Disposition of Cases
Railroad and Public Utility Cases
Questions of Trade Regulation
Labor Cases and Employers' Liability Cases
Criminal Cases and Prohibition Cases
The Judicial Veto
Special Focus

Changes in Court Membership: Disposition of Cases

A Different Supreme Court adjourned June 2, 1930, from that which opened the 1929–30 term on October 3, last. Chief Justice Taft was succeeded by Chief Justice Hughes, and, after a lengthy Senate contest, resulting in the rejection of President Hoover's nomination of John J. Parker of North Carolina, Owen J. Roberts was sworn in on the last day of the term to succeed the late Justice Sanford.

Chief Justice Taft came to Supreme Court, at a time when it was being heavily burdened by the increasing litigation that came to it from the flowed dockets of the state and federal courts. Yearly it disposed of some 700 cases, but new cases were coming in increasing numbers, and the Supreme Court found itself more and more in arrears. At the close of Chief Justice Taft's first year (1922–23), the Court was about 400 cases in arrears. The next year the number of cases carried over to the ensuing term was 462, and in the following year it was 558. Taft felt that something had to be clone to enable the Supreme Court to keep up with its work, and to set an example to other courts in the efficient administration of justice.

The method adopted by the late Chief Justice was to persuade Congress to pass the Jurisdictional Act of 1925 which enabled the Supreme Court, through the use of its own discretion, to give its attention to only such cases as it deemed to be of sufficient, public importance. The Jurisdictional Act produced striking results. During the four ensuing terms the Supreme Court disposed of about 850 cases a year, and made rapid inroads upon the number of cases in arrears. During the term just closed there was an increase in the number of cases docketed and a reduction in the number of cases decided, resulting in an increase in the number carried over to the next term. When it adjourned oil June 2, however, the Court had decided all cases argued before it during the term.

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Supreme Court
Sep. 28, 2012  Supreme Court Controversies
May 13, 2011  Class Action Lawsuits
Jan. 28, 2005  Supreme Court's Future
Sep. 17, 1993  Supreme Court Preview
Aug. 14, 1987  Supreme Court Nomination
Sep. 26, 1986  The Rehnquist Court
Oct. 26, 1979  Supreme Court and the Press
Sep. 22, 1978  Burger Court's Tenth Year
Jun. 24, 1977  Politics and the Federal Courts
Oct. 09, 1968  Challenging of Supreme Court
Sep. 28, 1966  Supreme Court: Legal Storm Center
Jan. 22, 1958  Criminal Prosecution and the Supreme Court
Jan. 23, 1952  Judges in Politics
Jun. 05, 1939  Supreme Court Decisions, 1938–39
Nov. 17, 1938  Supreme Court Appointments
May 31, 1938  Supreme Court Decisions, 1937–38
Jun. 01, 1937  Supreme Court Decisions, 1936–37
Jun. 01, 1936  Decisions of the Supreme Court, 1935-36
Jun. 05, 1933  Decisions of the Supreme Court, 1932-33
Jun. 04, 1932  Decisions of the Supreme Court, 1931–32
Jun. 06, 1931  Decisions of the Supreme Court, 1930–31
Jun. 09, 1930  Decisions of the Supreme Court, 1929–30
Jun. 10, 1929  Decisions of the Supreme Court, 1928-29
Jun. 09, 1928  Decisions of the Supreme Court 1927–28
Sep. 27, 1924  The Supreme Court Issue
BROWSE RELATED TOPICS:
Supreme Court History and Decisions
FEEDBACK

Your Email Address

Subject

Provide Feedback

Suggest a topic here.

Type the characters you see below into the box

Take our survey to help us improve CQ Researcher!