Canada and the American Tariff

August 10, 1929

Report Outline
Canadian-American Tariff Relations
Canada's Case Against American Tariffs
Canadian-American Trade Relations
Special Focus

The tariff revision now in progress at Washington has aroused almost as much interest and controversy in Canada as in the United States. Farmers across the northern border look upon the United States as one of their leading markets, and the fact that the Hawley—Smoot bill will be dedicated primarily to the relief of American agriculture makes it appear to Canadians to hold a special threat to their trade interests. Canadian newspapers have carried full reports from Washington on House and Senate tariff proceedings, their cartoonists have portrayed Uncle Sam in various attitudes of refusal to buy from Canada, political speakers have severely criticised American tariff policy, and in general there has been wide speculation throughout the Dominion as to the sort of bill Congress will finally enact.

Passage of the Hawley bill by the House, May 28, 1929, was followed by complaint in all of the Canadian provinces. Protests were particularly bitter in British Columbia, where it was asserted that the proposed duties on cedar lumber and shingles would practically terminate exportation of those products to the United States and would ruin one of the province's leading industries. In the prairie provinces objections were made to the proposed duties on cattle, hides and skins, and leather, while comment in Ontario and Quebec was largely concerned with the probable effects of higher duties on milk and cream, butter, cheese and maple sugar. Producers of fish and potatoes in the maritime provinces feared that the American market for their products would be severely curtailed. It was estimated that the increased duties proposed in the Hawley bill would affect adversely Canadian exports to the United States which in recent years have ranged in value from $35,000,000 to $50,000,000.

Conservative newspapers were vigorous in their denunciation of the bill, many of them calling for reprisals by Canada in the form of increased duties against American products. Liberal papers were in general more moderate in their comment, some of them suggesting that American tariffs against Canadian goods were already so high that increases would not make much difference, but there was displayed a substantially unanimous feeling of irritation of the sort expressed by the St. John Telegraph—Journal: “If we can buy oranges and grape fruit in the West Indies, by all means let us buy these articles there rather than in Florida or California.”

ISSUE TRACKER for Related Reports
Canada
Oct. 06, 1995  Quebec Sovereignty
Apr. 12, 1991  The Deepening Canadian Crisis Over Quebec
May 11, 1990  Will Canada Fall Apart?
Mar. 08, 1985  Canada's Time of Change
Dec. 24, 1981  Canada's Political Conflicts
Nov. 04, 1977  Quebec Separatism
Nov. 05, 1976  Canadian-American Relations
Oct. 18, 1972  Canadian Nationalism
Dec. 09, 1970  Canada's Troubled Economy
Feb. 04, 1970  Canada's Changing Foreign Policy
Jun. 12, 1968  Canadian Unity
Oct. 07, 1964  Canadian Separatism
Jun. 06, 1962  Canadian Election
May 29, 1957  Relations with Canada
May 06, 1941  Canada's War Effort
Jul. 18, 1930  Canadian General Election, 1930
Aug. 10, 1929  Canada and the American Tariff
Sep. 21, 1926  Canadian Politics and the Imperial Conference
BROWSE RELATED TOPICS:
Bilateral and Regional Trade
Regional Political Affairs: Canada